245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31610780)
1. Acute systemic inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide stimulation in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Liu H; Feye KM; Nguyen YT; Rakhshandeh A; Loving CL; Dekkers JCM; Gabler NK; Tuggle CK
BMC Genomics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):728. PubMed ID: 31610780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Post-weaning blood transcriptomic differences between Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Liu H; Nguyen YT; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC; Tuggle CK
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():73. PubMed ID: 26801403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Divergent selection for residual feed intake affects the transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of pig skeletal muscle.
Vincent A; Louveau I; Gondret F; Tréfeu C; Gilbert H; Lefaucheur L
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2745-58. PubMed ID: 26115262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A transcriptome multi-tissue analysis identifies biological pathways and genes associated with variations in feed efficiency of growing pigs.
Gondret F; Vincent A; Houée-Bigot M; Siegel A; Lagarrigue S; Causeur D; Gilbert H; Louveau I
BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):244. PubMed ID: 28327084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Whole Blood Transcriptomics Is Relevant to Identify Molecular Changes in Response to Genetic Selection for Feed Efficiency and Nutritional Status in the Pig.
Jégou M; Gondret F; Vincent A; Tréfeu C; Gilbert H; Louveau I
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146550. PubMed ID: 26752050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Difference in short-term responses to a high-fiber diet in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Montagne L; Loisel F; Le Naou T; Gondret F; Gilbert H; Le Gall M
J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1512-23. PubMed ID: 24496835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of thermal heat stress on energy utilization in two lines of pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Renaudeau D; Frances G; Dubois S; Gilbert H; Noblet J
J Anim Sci; 2013 Mar; 91(3):1162-75. PubMed ID: 23296816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tissue-specific responses of antioxidant pathways to poor hygiene conditions in growing pigs divergently selected for feed efficiency.
Sierżant K; Perruchot MH; Merlot E; Le Floc'h N; Gondret F
BMC Vet Res; 2019 Oct; 15(1):341. PubMed ID: 31619228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intestinal integrity, endotoxin transport and detoxification in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Mani V; Harris AJ; Keating AF; Weber TE; Dekkers JC; Gabler NK
J Anim Sci; 2013 May; 91(5):2141-50. PubMed ID: 23463550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metabolic changes and tissue responses to selection on residual feed intake in growing pigs.
Le Naou T; Le Floc'h N; Louveau I; Gilbert H; Gondret F
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4771-80. PubMed ID: 22871936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of inflammation stimulation on energy and nutrient utilization in piglets selected for low and high residual feed intake.
Labussière E; Dubois S; Gilbert H; Thibault JN; Le Floc'h N; Noblet J; van Milgen J
Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1653-61. PubMed ID: 26381577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing peripheral blood cell profile of Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Mpetile Z; Young JM; Gabler NK; Dekkers JC; Tuggle CK
J Anim Sci; 2015 Mar; 93(3):892-9. PubMed ID: 26020867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased expressions of genes and proteins involved in mitochondrial oxidation and antioxidant pathway in adipose tissue of pigs selected for a low residual feed intake.
Louveau I; Vincent A; Tacher S; Gilbert H; Gondret F
J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5042-5054. PubMed ID: 28046150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transcriptome profiling of the rumen epithelium of beef cattle differing in residual feed intake.
Kong RS; Liang G; Chen Y; Stothard P; Guan le L
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17():592. PubMed ID: 27506548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Divergence in Feed Efficiency on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Intestinal Immune Response in Both Unchallenged and Lipopolysaccharide Challenged Ileal and Colonic Explants.
Vigors S; O'Doherty JV; Kelly AK; O'Shea CJ; Sweeney T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148145. PubMed ID: 26840831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metabolic response to an inflammatory challenge in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Merlot E; Gilbert H; Le Floc'h N
J Anim Sci; 2016 Feb; 94(2):563-73. PubMed ID: 27065126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the basal colonic innate immune response of pigs divergent in feed efficiency and following an ex vivo lipopolysaccharide challenge.
Vigors S; O' Doherty JV; Ryan M; Sweeney T
Physiol Genomics; 2019 Sep; 51(9):443-448. PubMed ID: 31322475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gene expression analysis of blood, liver, and muscle in cattle divergently selected for high and low residual feed intake.
Khansefid M; Millen CA; Chen Y; Pryce JE; Chamberlain AJ; Vander Jagt CJ; Gondro C; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2017 Nov; 95(11):4764-4775. PubMed ID: 29293712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of lower-energy, higher-fiber diets on pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake when fed higher-energy, lower-fiber diets.
Mauch ED; Young JM; Serão NVL; Hsu WL; Patience JF; Kerr BJ; Weber TE; Gabler NK; Dekkers JCM
J Anim Sci; 2018 Apr; 96(4):1221-1236. PubMed ID: 29669076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feed efficiency effects on barrow and gilt behavioral reactivity to novel stimuli tests.
Colpoys JD; Abell CE; Gabler NK; Keating AF; Millman ST; Siegford JM; Young JM; Johnson AK
J Anim Sci; 2015 Mar; 93(3):1267-75. PubMed ID: 26020903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
