These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31611780)

  • 1. The Principle of Inverse Effectiveness in Audiovisual Speech Perception.
    van de Rijt LPH; Roye A; Mylanus EAM; van Opstal AJ; van Wanrooij MM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():335. PubMed ID: 31611780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aging, audiovisual integration, and the principle of inverse effectiveness.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers M; Spehar B; Myerson J; Hale S
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 20473178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. During Lipreading Training With Sentence Stimuli, Feedback Controls Learning and Generalization to Audiovisual Speech in Noise.
    Bernstein LE; Auer ET; Eberhardt SP
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 31(1):57-77. PubMed ID: 34965362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise.
    MacLeod A; Summerfield Q
    Br J Audiol; 1987 May; 21(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 3594015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validating a Method to Assess Lipreading, Audiovisual Gain, and Integration During Speech Reception With Cochlear-Implanted and Normal-Hearing Subjects Using a Talking Head.
    Schreitmüller S; Frenken M; Bentz L; Ortmann M; Walger M; Meister H
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):503-516. PubMed ID: 29068860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.
    Crosse MJ; Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9888-95. PubMed ID: 27656026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):656-68. PubMed ID: 17804980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiovisual speech perception in children with developmental language disorder in degraded listening conditions.
    Meronen A; Tiippana K; Westerholm J; Ahonen T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 56(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 22653918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lipreading: A Review of Its Continuing Importance for Speech Recognition With an Acquired Hearing Loss and Possibilities for Effective Training.
    Bernstein LE; Jordan N; Auer ET; Eberhardt SP
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun; 31(2):453-469. PubMed ID: 35316072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audiovisual Spoken Word Recognition by Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Holt RF; Gao S; Qi R; Gehrlein BL
    Audiol Med; 2007 Dec; 5(4):250-261. PubMed ID: 19823696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional localization of audiovisual speech using near infrared spectroscopy.
    Butera IM; Larson ED; DeFreese AJ; Lee AK; Gifford RH; Wallace MT
    Brain Topogr; 2022 Jul; 35(4):416-430. PubMed ID: 35821542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiovisual speech integration and lipreading in autism.
    Smith EG; Bennetto L
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 48(8):813-21. PubMed ID: 17683453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiovisual spoken word recognition as a clinical criterion for sensory aids efficiency in Persian-language children with hearing loss.
    Oryadi-Zanjani MM; Vahab M; Bazrafkan M; Haghjoo A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2424-7. PubMed ID: 26607564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing-impaired listeners show increased audiovisual benefit when listening to speech in noise.
    Puschmann S; Daeglau M; Stropahl M; Mirkovic B; Rosemann S; Thiel CM; Debener S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():261-268. PubMed ID: 30978494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.