These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31612318)

  • 1. Postoperative biochemical recurrence of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Heo JE; Park JS; Lee JS; Kim J; Jang WS; Cho NH; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Ham WS
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 146(1):221-227. PubMed ID: 31612318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy on Disease Progression and Adjuvant Treatment in Pathologically Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Tomasković I; Milicić V; Tomić M; Ruzić B; Ulamec M
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):697-700. PubMed ID: 26898068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP
    Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patterns and predictors of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy in men with pT3N0 prostate cancer: implications for multimodal therapies.
    Briganti A; Joniau S; Gandaglia G; Cozzarini C; Sun M; Tombal B; Haustermans K; Hinkelbein W; Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):960-7. PubMed ID: 24351411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?
    Pettenati C; Neuzillet Y; Radulescu C; Hervé JM; Molinié V; Lebret T
    World J Urol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1973-8. PubMed ID: 25939539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk stratification of patients with extraprostatic extension and negative lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy: identifying optimal candidates for adjuvant therapy.
    Eisenberg MS; Karnes RJ; Kaushik D; Rangel L; Bergstralh EJ; Boorjian SA
    J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1735-41. PubMed ID: 23727312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Kano H; Kadono Y; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Kawaguchi S; Nohara T; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Ikeda H; Mizokami A
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jan; 41(1):509-516. PubMed ID: 33419850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
    Heo JE; Park JS; Lee JS; Kim J; Jang WS; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Ham WS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(42):e17627. PubMed ID: 31626145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact on oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer of converting soft tissue margins at the apex and bladder neck from tumour-positive to -negative.
    Pak S; Park S; Kim M; Go H; Cho YM; Ahn H
    BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):811-817. PubMed ID: 29978558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Isbarn H; Steuber T; Eichelberg C; Köllermann J; Fisch M; Karakiewicz PI; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 20128781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of positive surgical margins on biochemical failure, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and overall survival after radical prostatectomy: median long-term results.
    Huri E; Aydogmus Y; Doluoglu OG; Dadali M; Karakan T; Emir L; Germiyanoglu C
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2014 Oct; 30(10):510-4. PubMed ID: 25438682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.