152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31612318)
1. Postoperative biochemical recurrence of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Heo JE; Park JS; Lee JS; Kim J; Jang WS; Cho NH; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Ham WS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 146(1):221-227. PubMed ID: 31612318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy on Disease Progression and Adjuvant Treatment in Pathologically Localized Prostate Cancer.
Tomasković I; Milicić V; Tomić M; Ruzić B; Ulamec M
Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):697-700. PubMed ID: 26898068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP
Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patterns and predictors of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy in men with pT3N0 prostate cancer: implications for multimodal therapies.
Briganti A; Joniau S; Gandaglia G; Cozzarini C; Sun M; Tombal B; Haustermans K; Hinkelbein W; Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):960-7. PubMed ID: 24351411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?
Pettenati C; Neuzillet Y; Radulescu C; Hervé JM; Molinié V; Lebret T
World J Urol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1973-8. PubMed ID: 25939539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk stratification of patients with extraprostatic extension and negative lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy: identifying optimal candidates for adjuvant therapy.
Eisenberg MS; Karnes RJ; Kaushik D; Rangel L; Bergstralh EJ; Boorjian SA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1735-41. PubMed ID: 23727312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy.
Kano H; Kadono Y; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Kawaguchi S; Nohara T; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Ikeda H; Mizokami A
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jan; 41(1):509-516. PubMed ID: 33419850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
Heo JE; Park JS; Lee JS; Kim J; Jang WS; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Ham WS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(42):e17627. PubMed ID: 31626145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact on oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer of converting soft tissue margins at the apex and bladder neck from tumour-positive to -negative.
Pak S; Park S; Kim M; Go H; Cho YM; Ahn H
BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):811-817. PubMed ID: 29978558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Isbarn H; Steuber T; Eichelberg C; Köllermann J; Fisch M; Karakiewicz PI; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 20128781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of positive surgical margins on biochemical failure, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and overall survival after radical prostatectomy: median long-term results.
Huri E; Aydogmus Y; Doluoglu OG; Dadali M; Karakan T; Emir L; Germiyanoglu C
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2014 Oct; 30(10):510-4. PubMed ID: 25438682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
