These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31613679)
1. Face, Content, and Construct Validity of the Take-Home EoSim Augmented Reality Laparoscopy Simulator for Basic Laparoscopic Tasks. Arts EEA; Leijte E; Witteman BPL; Jakimowicz JJ; Verhoeven B; Botden SMBI J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Nov; 29(11):1419-1426. PubMed ID: 31613679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks. Leijte E; Arts E; Witteman B; Jakimowicz J; De Blaauw I; Botden S Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3635-3643. PubMed ID: 30671668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motion Analysis-Based Skills Training and Assessment in Pediatric Laparoscopy: Construct, Concurrent, and Content Validity for the eoSim Simulator. Retrosi G; Cundy T; Haddad M; Clarke S J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Nov; 25(11):944-50. PubMed ID: 26259166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Training benchmarks based on validated composite scores for the RobotiX robot-assisted surgery simulator on basic tasks. Leijte E; Claassen L; Arts E; de Blaauw I; Rosman C; Botden SMBI J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 32314094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Construct, concurrent, and content validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator. Hennessey IA; Hewett P J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Oct; 23(10):855-60. PubMed ID: 23968255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Construct validity of eoSim - a low-cost and portable laparoscopic simulator. Mansoor SM; Våpenstad C; Mårvik R; Glomsaker T; Bliksøen M Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2020 Oct; 29(5):261-268. PubMed ID: 31280633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a Visual-Spatial Secondary Task to Assess Automaticity in Laparoscopic Skills. Castillo R; Alvarado J; Moreno P; Billeke P; Martínez C; Varas J; Jarufe N J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(4):1001-1005. PubMed ID: 29287751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a novel basic virtual reality simulator, the LAP-X, for training basic laparoscopic skills. Kawaguchi K; Egi H; Hattori M; Sawada H; Suzuki T; Ohdan H Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Oct; 23(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 24773373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Face, content, and construct validity of a novel portable ergonomic simulator for basic laparoscopic skills. Xiao D; Jakimowicz JJ; Albayrak A; Buzink SN; Botden SM; Goossens RH J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 24411426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of validity evidence for the RobotiX robot assisted surgery simulator on advanced suturing tasks. Leijte E; de Blaauw I; Rosman C; Botden SMBI BMC Surg; 2020 Aug; 20(1):183. PubMed ID: 32787831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO. Verdaasdonk EG; Stassen LP; Monteny LJ; Dankelman J Surg Endosc; 2006 Mar; 20(3):511-8. PubMed ID: 16437275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtual reality-based assessment of basic laparoscopic skills using the Leap Motion controller. Lahanas V; Loukas C; Georgiou K; Lababidi H; Al-Jaroudi D Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5012-5023. PubMed ID: 28466361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transferability of laparoscopic skills using the virtual reality simulator. Yang C; Kalinitschenko U; Helmert JR; Weitz J; Reissfelder C; Mees ST Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4132-4137. PubMed ID: 29602986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Take-Home Laparoscopy Simulators in Pediatric Surgery: Is More Expensive Better? Bökkerink GMJ; Joosten M; Leijte E; Verhoeven BH; de Blaauw I; Botden SMBI J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Jan; 31(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 33275863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Face, content, and construct validity of the EndoViS training system for objective assessment of psychomotor skills of laparoscopic surgeons. Escamirosa FP; Flores RM; García IO; Vidal CR; Martínez AM Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3392-403. PubMed ID: 25515985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a novel laparoscopic adjustable gastric band simulator. Sankaranarayanan G; Adair JD; Halic T; Gromski MA; Lu Z; Ahn W; Jones DB; De S Surg Endosc; 2011 Apr; 25(4):1012-8. PubMed ID: 20734069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved laparoscopic skills in gynaecology trainees following a simulation-training program using take-home box trainers. Wilson E; Janssens S; McLindon LA; Hewett DG; Jolly B; Beckmann M Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Feb; 59(1):110-116. PubMed ID: 29573269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Face, content and construct validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator. Brewin J; Nedas T; Challacombe B; Elhage O; Keisu J; Dasgupta P BJU Int; 2010 Sep; 106(6):850-4. PubMed ID: 20128776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]