These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31613693)
1. Utilization and Cost of Mammography Screening Among Commercially Insured Women 50 to 64 Years of Age in the United States, 2012-2016. Khushalani JS; Ekwueme DU; Richards TB; Sabatino SA; Guy GP; Zhang Y; Tangka F J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 Mar; 29(3):327-337. PubMed ID: 31613693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding Regional Variation in the Cost of Breast Cancer Screening Among Privately Insured Women in the United States. Kunst N; Long JB; Xu X; Busch SH; Kyanko KA; Lindau ST; Richman IB; Gross CP Med Care; 2021 May; 59(5):437-443. PubMed ID: 33560712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Patterns Among Women With Medicaid and Commercial Insurance. Bonafede MM; Miller JD; Pohlman SK; Troeger KA; Sprague BL; Herschorn SD; Winer IH Am J Prev Med; 2019 Sep; 57(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 31377088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast Screening Utilization and Cost Sharing Among Employed Insured Women After the Affordable Care Act. Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Kolenic G; Kamdar N; Kobernik E; Bell S; Dalton VK J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jun; 16(6):788-796. PubMed ID: 30833168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevalence of Out-Of-Pocket Payments for Mammography Screening Among Recently Screened Women. Sabatino SA; Thompson TD; Miller JW; Breen N; White MC; Breslau E; Shoemaker ML J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Jul; 28(7):910-918. PubMed ID: 30265611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the elimination of cost sharing for mammographic breast cancer screening among rural US women: A natural experiment. Peppercorn J; Horick N; Houck K; Rabin J; Villagra V; Lyman GH; Wheeler SB Cancer; 2017 Jul; 123(13):2506-2515. PubMed ID: 28195644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening Mammography for Free: Impact of Eliminating Cost Sharing on Cancer Screening Rates. Jena AB; Huang J; Fireman B; Fung V; Gazelle S; Landrum MB; Chernew M; Newhouse JP; Hsu J Health Serv Res; 2017 Feb; 52(1):191-206. PubMed ID: 26990550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands. Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening Mammography Use Among Older Women Before and After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations. Chang CH; Bynum JP; Onega T; Colla CH; Lurie JD; Tosteson AN J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Oct; 25(10):1030-1037. PubMed ID: 27427790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Utilization Updates. Boroumand G; Teberian I; Parker L; Rao VM; Levin DC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1092-1096. PubMed ID: 29570370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid Fee-for-Service program: 1999-2008. Bhanegaonkar A; Madhavan SS; Khanna R; Remick SC J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2012 Aug; 21(8):821-9. PubMed ID: 22568434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography rates after the 2009 revision to the United States Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendation. Qin X; Tangka FK; Guy GP; Howard DH Cancer Causes Control; 2017 Jan; 28(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 28025762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: comparison of current practice and advocated guidelines. O'Donoghue C; Eklund M; Ozanne EM; Esserman LJ Ann Intern Med; 2014 Feb; 160(3):145. PubMed ID: 24658691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interval breast cancers in the 'screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography' (STORM) population-based trial. Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Brunelli S; Fantò C; Valentini M; Romanucci G; Gentilini MA; Zorzi M; Macaskill P Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():150-153. PubMed ID: 29328943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in a US Medicaid Population. Miller JD; Bonafede MM; Herschorn SD; Pohlman SK; Troeger KA; Fajardo LL J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Apr; 14(4):467-474.e5. PubMed ID: 28139412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer screening utilization and understanding of current guidelines among rural U.S. women with private insurance. Peppercorn J; Houck K; Beri N; Villagra V; Wogu AF; Lyman GH; Wheeler SB Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):659-67. PubMed ID: 26386956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) instead of mammography on population screening outcomes including interval cancer rates: Results of the Trento DBT pilot evaluation. Bernardi D; Gentilini MA; De Nisi M; Pellegrini M; Fantò C; Valentini M; Sabatino V; Luparia A; Houssami N Breast; 2020 Apr; 50():135-140. PubMed ID: 31607526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Resource Utilization and Clinical Outcomes Following Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Findings From a Learning Health System. Alsheik NH; Dabbous F; Pohlman SK; Troeger KM; Gliklich RE; Donadio GM; Su Z; Menon V; Conant EF Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 30057195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]