147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31614691)
21. Use of meta-analyses and joint analyses to select variants in whole genome sequences for genomic evaluation: An application in milk production of French dairy cattle breeds.
Teissier M; Sanchez MP; Boussaha M; Barbat A; Hoze C; Robert-Granie C; Croiseau P
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Apr; 101(4):3126-3139. PubMed ID: 29428760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model with different genomic relationship matrices.
Zhou L; Lund MS; Wang Y; Su G
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Aug; 131(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 24750283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle.
Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability of breeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle: When dry matter intake recordings are sparse under different scenarios.
Negussie E; Mehtiö T; Mäntysaari P; Løvendahl P; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer MH
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7248-7262. PubMed ID: 31155258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of genomic prediction when combining two related crossbred populations.
Vallée A; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4342-8. PubMed ID: 25149337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
Naderi S; Yin T; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A first step toward genomic selection in the multi-breed French dairy goat population.
Carillier C; Larroque H; Palhière I; Clément V; Rupp R; Robert-Granié C
J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(11):7294-7305. PubMed ID: 24054303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Utility of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction.
Raymond B; Bouwman AC; Schrooten C; Houwing-Duistermaat J; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):27. PubMed ID: 29776327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Genotyping more cows increases genetic gain and reduces rate of true inbreeding in a dairy cattle breeding scheme using female reproductive technologies.
Thomasen JR; Liu H; Sørensen AC
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):597-606. PubMed ID: 31733861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Components of the accuracy of genomic prediction in a multi-breed sheep population.
Daetwyler HD; Kemper KE; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ
J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3375-84. PubMed ID: 23038744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prediction of genomic breeding values for growth, carcass and meat quality traits in a multi-breed sheep population using a HD SNP chip.
Brito LF; Clarke SM; McEwan JC; Miller SP; Pickering NK; Bain WE; Dodds KG; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 28122512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Genomic predictions based on a joint reference population for the Nordic Red cattle breeds.
Zhou L; Heringstad B; Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Grove H; Nielsen US; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(7):4485-96. PubMed ID: 24792791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection.
Porto-Neto LR; Barendse W; Henshall JM; McWilliam SM; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():84. PubMed ID: 26525050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
