147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31614691)
41. Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.
Uemoto Y; Sasaki S; Kojima T; Sugimoto Y; Watanabe T
BMC Genet; 2015 Nov; 16():134. PubMed ID: 26586567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.
Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 19749023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Genetic diversity of a New Zealand multi-breed sheep population and composite breeds' history revealed by a high-density SNP chip.
Brito LF; McEwan JC; Miller SP; Pickering NK; Bain WE; Dodds KG; Schenkel FS; Clarke SM
BMC Genet; 2017 Mar; 18(1):25. PubMed ID: 28288558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of joint versus purebred genomic evaluation in the French multi-breed dairy goat population.
Carillier C; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):67. PubMed ID: 25927866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population.
Pryce JE; Gredler B; Bolormaa S; Bowman PJ; Egger-Danner C; Fuerst C; Emmerling R; Sölkner J; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2011 May; 94(5):2625-30. PubMed ID: 21524555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The impact of genotyping different groups of animals on accuracy when moving from traditional to genomic selection.
Pszczola M; Strabel T; van Arendonk JAM; Calus MPL
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5412-5421. PubMed ID: 22916948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Improving the Accuracy of Multi-Breed Prediction in Admixed Populations by Accounting for the Breed Origin of Haplotype Segments.
Schmid M; Stock J; Bennewitz J; Wellmann R
Front Genet; 2022; 13():840815. PubMed ID: 35401683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population.
Dehnavi E; Mahyari SA; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5166-5176. PubMed ID: 29605309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The impact of training strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictors in United States Red Angus cattle.
Lee J; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3406-3414. PubMed ID: 28805929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Genetic Diversity and Signatures of Selection in 15 Chinese Indigenous Dog Breeds Revealed by Genome-Wide SNPs.
Yang Q; Chen H; Ye J; Liu C; Wei R; Chen C; Huang L
Front Genet; 2019; 10():1174. PubMed ID: 31803243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Using the unified relationship matrix adjusted by breed-wise allele frequencies in genomic evaluation of a multibreed population.
Makgahlela ML; Strandén I; Nielsen US; Sillanpää MJ; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Feb; 97(2):1117-27. PubMed ID: 24342683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Fixed-length haplotypes can improve genomic prediction accuracy in an admixed dairy cattle population.
Hess M; Druet T; Hess A; Garrick D
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):54. PubMed ID: 28673233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Multiple-breed genomic evaluation by principal component analysis in small size populations.
Gaspa G; Jorjani H; Dimauro C; Cellesi M; Ajmone-Marsan P; Stella A; Macciotta NP
Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):738-49. PubMed ID: 25482828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.
Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):909-19. PubMed ID: 27065253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Genomic selection for crossbred performance accounting for breed-specific effects.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; Hidalgo AM; van Arendonk JAM; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JWM
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):51. PubMed ID: 28651536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
