These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31616791)

  • 1. Unusual kinematics of the Papatea fault (2016 Kaikōura earthquake) suggest anelastic rupture.
    Diederichs A; Nissen EK; Lajoie LJ; Langridge RM; Malireddi SR; Clark KJ; Hamling IJ; Tagliasacchi A
    Sci Adv; 2019 Oct; 5(10):eaax5703. PubMed ID: 31616791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Triple junction kinematics accounts for the 2016 M
    Shi X; Tapponnier P; Wang T; Wei S; Wang Y; Wang X; Jiao L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(52):26367-26375. PubMed ID: 31822611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complex multifault rupture during the 2016
    Hamling IJ; Hreinsdóttir S; Clark K; Elliott J; Liang C; Fielding E; Litchfield N; Villamor P; Wallace L; Wright TJ; D'Anastasio E; Bannister S; Burbidge D; Denys P; Gentle P; Howarth J; Mueller C; Palmer N; Pearson C; Power W; Barnes P; Barrell DJ; Van Dissen R; Langridge R; Little T; Nicol A; Pettinga J; Rowland J; Stirling M
    Science; 2017 Apr; 356(6334):. PubMed ID: 28336563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shallow fault-zone dilatancy recovery after the 2003 Bam earthquake in Iran.
    Fielding EJ; Lundgren PR; Bürgmann R; Funning GJ
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7234):64-8. PubMed ID: 19262670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research on the Surface Deformation, Fault Rupture, and Coseismic Geohazard of the 2022 Luding Mw 6.8 Earthquake.
    Lu Y; Yang Y; Zeng L; Xu W; Song J; Li X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 38139720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional deformation caused by the Bam, Iran, earthquake and the origin of shallow slip deficit.
    Fialko Y; Sandwell D; Simons M; Rosen P
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):295-9. PubMed ID: 15902247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coseismic fault slip inversion of the 2013 Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake based on the triangular dislocation model.
    Duan H; Chen J; Zhang S; Wu X; Chu Z
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3514. PubMed ID: 35241753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coseismic and Postseismic Fault Slip for the 17 August 1999, M = 7.5, Izmit, Turkey Earthquake.
    Reilinger RE; Ergintav S; Bürgmann R; McClusky S; Lenk O; Barka A; Gurkan O; Hearn L; Feigl KL; Cakmak R; Aktug B; Ozener H; Töksoz MN
    Science; 2000 Sep; 289(5484):1519-1524. PubMed ID: 10968782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A New Perspective on Fault Geometry and Slip Distribution of the 2009 Dachaidan Mw 6.3 Earthquake from InSAR Observations.
    Liu Y; Xu C; Wen Y; Fok HS
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):16786-803. PubMed ID: 26184210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San Andreas fault system.
    Fialko Y
    Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7096):968-71. PubMed ID: 16791192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coseismic river avulsion on surface rupturing faults: Assessing earthquake-induced flood hazard.
    McEwan E; Stahl T; Howell A; Langridge R; Wilson M
    Sci Adv; 2023 May; 9(18):eadd2932. PubMed ID: 37134168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeated giant earthquakes on the Wairarapa fault, New Zealand, revealed by Lidar-based paleoseismology.
    Manighetti I; Perrin C; Gaudemer Y; Dominguez S; Stewart N; Malavieille J; Garambois S
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2124. PubMed ID: 32034264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Slip on a mapped normal fault for the 28
    Meschis M; Roberts GP; Mildon ZK; Robertson J; Michetti AM; Faure Walker JP
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6481. PubMed ID: 31019226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanics of near-field deformation during co- and post-seismic shallow fault slip.
    Nevitt JM; Brooks BA; Catchings RD; Goldman MR; Ericksen TL; Glennie CL
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):5031. PubMed ID: 32193474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic viability of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake cascade on weak crustal faults.
    Ulrich T; Gabriel AA; Ampuero JP; Xu W
    Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1213. PubMed ID: 30872591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress loading history of earthquake faults influenced by fault/shear zone geometry and Coulomb pre-stress.
    Sgambato C; Faure Walker JP; Mildon ZK; Roberts GP
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12724. PubMed ID: 32728150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface deformations of the 6 February 2023 earthquake sequence, eastern Türkiye.
    Meng J; Kusky T; Mooney WD; Bozkurt E; Bodur MN; Wang L
    Science; 2024 Jan; 383(6680):298-305. PubMed ID: 38236960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coulomb pre-stress and fault bends are ignored yet vital factors for earthquake triggering and hazard.
    Mildon ZK; Roberts GP; Faure Walker JP; Toda S
    Nat Commun; 2019 Jun; 10(1):2744. PubMed ID: 31227694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of Weak Materials in Earthquake Rupture Dynamics.
    Hirono T; Tsuda K; Kaneki S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6604. PubMed ID: 31036864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immature characteristics of the East Anatolian Fault Zone from SAR, GNSS and strong motion data of the 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquake doublet.
    Liu J; Huang C; Zhang G; Shan X; Korzhenkov A; Taymaz T
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10625. PubMed ID: 38724632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.