These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31617348)

  • 1. Finding the Right Finish Line in Eukaryotic Transcription.
    Persson L; Brandman O
    Biochemistry; 2019 Oct; 58(43):4335-4336. PubMed ID: 31617348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal and internal discrepancies of zirconia copings: effects of milling system and finish line design.
    Ribeiro IL; Campos F; Sousa RS; Alves ML; Rodrigues DM; Souza RO; Bottino MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 25961609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fatigue and fracture resistance of zirconia crowns prepared with different finish line designs.
    Aboushelib MN
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jan; 21(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 22040309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques regarding finish line locations and impression time.
    Koulivand S; Ghodsi S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Mar; 32(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 31565836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Thor A
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 Feb; 18(1):27. PubMed ID: 29471825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An In Vivo Evaluation of the Fit of Zirconium-Oxide Based, Ceramic Single Crowns with Vertical and Horizontal Finish Line Preparations.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S; Biscaro L; Stellini E
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 24(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 26359654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
    Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Tooth Preparation Design on Fitting Accuracy of CAD-CAM Based Restorations.
    Ates SM; Yesil Duymus Z
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016 Jul; 28(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 27061751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Brufau-de Barberà M; Gomes-Azevedo S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 22372886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Porcelain-veneered computer-generated partial crowns.
    Denissen HW; El-Zohairy AA; van Waas MA; Feilzer AJ
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12553615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of finish line curvature on the marginal gap width of ceramic copings.
    Asavapanumas C; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 23566603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Teeth Prepared by Senior Dental Students for CAD/CAM Restorations.
    Sadid-Zadeh R; DeLuca JT; Arany H; Li R
    J Dent Educ; 2020 Mar; 84(3):358-366. PubMed ID: 32176344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The computer-aided design and manufacture of unilateral orbital defect restoration].
    Wu GF; Zhao YM; Liu XF; Li DC; Qu L; Liu L
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jun; 22(3):224-6. PubMed ID: 15293470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of accuracy and precision of automated robotic tooth preparation system for porcelain laminate veneers.
    Otani T; Raigrodski AJ; Mancl L; Kanuma I; Rosen J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25957239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal and internal adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings and crowns with different finish line designs.
    Komine F; Iwai T; Kobayashi K; Matsumura H
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Sep; 26(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 18203465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of tooth preparations for zirconia-based crowns and fixed dental prostheses using stereolithography data sets.
    Winkelmeyer C; Wolfart S; Marotti J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Nov; 116(5):783-789. PubMed ID: 27236595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system.
    Souza RO; Özcan M; Pavanelli CA; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Michida SM; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22050205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. All-ceramic crowns and preparation characteristics: a mathematic approach.
    Oilo G; Törnquist A; Durling D; Andersson M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12854796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.