These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31618097)

  • 1. Infants and Adults Use Visual Cues to Improve Detection and Discrimination of Speech in Noise.
    Lalonde K; Werner LA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3860-3875. PubMed ID: 31618097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audiovisual speech perception in infancy: The influence of vowel identity and infants' productive abilities on sensitivity to (mis)matches between auditory and visual speech cues.
    Altvater-Mackensen N; Mani N; Grossmann T
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Feb; 52(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 26595352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of noise and audiovisual cues on speech processing in adults with and without ADHD.
    Michalek AM; Watson SM; Ash I; Ringleb S; Raymer A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 24456181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audiovisual training is better than auditory-only training for auditory-only speech-in-noise identification.
    Lidestam B; Moradi S; Pettersson R; Ricklefs T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL142-7. PubMed ID: 25096138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aging, audiovisual integration, and the principle of inverse effectiveness.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers M; Spehar B; Myerson J; Hale S
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 20473178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using auditory-visual speech to probe the basis of noise-impaired consonant-vowel perception in dyslexia and auditory neuropathy.
    Ramirez J; Mann V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1122-33. PubMed ID: 16158666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infants' and Adults' Use of Temporal Cues in Consonant Discrimination.
    Cabrera L; Werner L
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 28338496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.
    Krull V; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 26458131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.
    Bonino AY; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4446. PubMed ID: 25669256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiovisual speech perception development at varying levels of perceptual processing.
    Lalonde K; Holt RF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1713. PubMed ID: 27106318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Influence of Target and Masker Characteristics on Infants' and Adults' Detection of Speech.
    Oster MM; Werner LA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3625-3631. PubMed ID: 29192318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visually guided auditory attention in a dynamic "cocktail-party" speech perception task: ERP evidence for age-related differences.
    Getzmann S; Wascher E
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():98-108. PubMed ID: 27825858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preschoolers benefit from visually salient speech cues.
    Lalonde K; Holt RF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 25322336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of acoustic fine structure cues on the recognition of auditory-only and audiovisual speech.
    Meister H; Fuersen K; Schreitmueller S; Walger M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3116. PubMed ID: 27369134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High visual resolution matters in audiovisual speech perception, but only for some.
    Alsius A; Wayne RV; Paré M; Munhall KG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1472-87. PubMed ID: 27150616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-modal enhancement of speech detection in young and older adults: does signal content matter?
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar B; Myerson J; Sommers MS; Hale S
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):650-5. PubMed ID: 21478751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.