These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31618617)

  • 1. Propensity Score Matching: The 'Devil is in the Details' Where More May Be Hidden than You Know.
    Reiffel JA
    Am J Med; 2020 Feb; 133(2):178-181. PubMed ID: 31618617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity-Score Matching: Optimal, Adequate, or Incomplete?
    Reiffel JA
    J Atr Fibrillation; 2018 Dec; 11(4):2130. PubMed ID: 31139292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Propensity Score Matching in Nonrandomized Studies: A Concept Simply Explained Using Antidepressant Treatment During Pregnancy as an Example.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2017 Feb; 78(2):e162-e165. PubMed ID: 28234438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primer on statistical interpretation or methods report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review.
    Austin PC
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2008 Sep; 1(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 20031790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching.
    Baser O
    Value Health; 2006; 9(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 17076868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The feasibility of matching on a propensity score for acupuncture in a prospective cohort study of patients with chronic pain.
    Johnson ES; Dickerson JF; Vollmer WM; Rowley AM; Ritenbaugh C; Deyo RA; DeBar L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28302054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Propensity Score Methods to Estimate Treatment Effects: An Opportunity for Rehabilitation Service Research].
    Fauser D; Bethge M
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2019 Feb; 58(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 30769358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review of propensity score methods in the acute care surgery literature: avoiding the pitfalls and proposing a set of reporting guidelines.
    Zakrison TL; Austin PC; McCredie VA
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2018 Jun; 44(3):385-395. PubMed ID: 28342097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Propensity Score Methods for Analyzing Observational Data Like Randomized Experiments: Challenges and Solutions for Rare Outcomes and Exposures.
    Ross ME; Kreider AR; Huang YS; Matone M; Rubin DM; Localio AR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 181(12):989-95. PubMed ID: 25995287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using propensity score matching to construct experimental stimuli.
    Huber S; Dietrich JF; Nagengast B; Moeller K
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):1107-1119. PubMed ID: 27421975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal caliper width for propensity score matching of three treatment groups: a Monte Carlo study.
    Wang Y; Cai H; Li C; Jiang Z; Wang L; Song J; Xia J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81045. PubMed ID: 24349029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity Score Analysis with Partially Observed Baseline Covariates: A Practical Comparison of Methods for Handling Missing Data.
    Bottigliengo D; Lorenzoni G; Ocagli H; Martinato M; Berchialla P; Gregori D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34206234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Matched or unmatched analyses with propensity-score-matched data?
    Wan F
    Stat Med; 2019 Jan; 38(2):289-300. PubMed ID: 30276839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Propensity score: Interests, use and limitations. A practical guide for clinicians].
    Moulis G; Lapeyre-Mestre M
    Rev Med Interne; 2018 Oct; 39(10):805-812. PubMed ID: 29514739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
    Green AK; Reeder-Hayes KE; Corty RW; Basch E; Milowsky MI; Dusetzina SB; Bennett AV; Wood WA
    Oncologist; 2015 May; 20(5):464-e20. PubMed ID: 25876994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of triple therapy with direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C genotype 1 infection: application of propensity score matching in a national HCV treatment registry.
    Gray E; Pasta DJ; Norris S; O'Leary A;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Apr; 17(1):288. PubMed ID: 28424064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
    Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulatory considerations in the design of comparative observational studies using propensity scores.
    Yue LQ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 23075022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.