BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31619090)

  • 1. Development of birth weight for gestational age charts and comparison with currently used charts: defining growth in the Polish population.
    Kajdy A; Modzelewski J; Filipecka-Tyczka D; Pokropek A; Rabijewski M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(18):2977-2984. PubMed ID: 31619090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the role of maternal race on the prediction of NICU admission by three growth charts: a cross-sectional study.
    Nahirney M; Chaput KH; Metcalfe A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Apr; 34(8):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 31189402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
    Choi SKY; Gordon A; Hilder L; Henry A; Hyett JA; Brew BK; Joseph F; Jorm L; Chambers GM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of updated birth weight, length and head circumference charts by gestational age in China with the INTERGROWTH-21st NCSS charts: a population-based study.
    Zhang YQ; Li H; Zong XN; Wu HH
    World J Pediatr; 2023 Jan; 19(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 36306051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.
    Vieira MC; Relph S; Persson M; Seed PT; Pasupathy D
    PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002902. PubMed ID: 31539391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.
    Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC
    PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences When Classifying Small for Gestational Age Preterm Infants According to the Growth Chart Applied.
    Estañ-Capell J; Alarcón-Torres B; Miró-Pedro M; Martínez-Costa C
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1212-e1219. PubMed ID: 36709759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100527. PubMed ID: 34763120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing the Efficacy of Various Growth Charts in Evaluating the Incidences of Small for Gestational Age and Large for Gestational Age at Birth Among Liveborn Neonates Delivered at a Tertiary Teaching Hospital.
    Singamala RR; Subramanian P; Chitgupikar SR
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e38058. PubMed ID: 37228563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between the Brazilian and 3 international gestational weight gain charts.
    Farias DR; Carrilho TRB; Rasmussen KM; Hutcheon JA; Reichenheim ME; Barros DC; da Gama SGN; Kac G
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2022 Oct; 116(4):1157-1167. PubMed ID: 35675297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21
    Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individualized sex-specific birth weight percentiles for gestational age based on maternal height and weight.
    Voigt M; Rochow N; Landau-Crangle E; Meyer-Kahrweg LM; Olbertz DM; Kunze M; Nikischin W; Wittwer-Backofen U; Rochow M; Däbritz J; Hentschel R
    J Perinat Med; 2020 Aug; 49(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 32866126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Birthweight percentiles by gestational age for births following assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand, 2002-2010.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1787-800. PubMed ID: 24908671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A; Khan N; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Chiossi G; Pedroza C; Costantine MM; Truong VTT; Gargano G; Saade GR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 50(2):156-166. PubMed ID: 27935148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adverse perinatal outcomes in immigrants: A ten-year population-based observational study and assessment of growth charts.
    Choi SKY; Henry A; Hilder L; Gordon A; Jorm L; Chambers GM
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 33(6):421-432. PubMed ID: 31476081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcome dependent growth curves for singleton pregnancies based on birth weight of babies for Polish population.
    Dera-Szymanowska A; Horst N; Sobkowski M; Szymanowski K
    Ginekol Pol; 2020; 91(12):740-747. PubMed ID: 33447993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of INTERGROWTH-21 and Fenton growth standards to assess size at birth and extrauterine growth in very preterm infants.
    Tuzun F; Yucesoy E; Baysal B; Kumral A; Duman N; Ozkan H
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Sep; 31(17):2252-2257. PubMed ID: 28587527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.