BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31619112)

  • 1. Objective Acoustic Quantification of Perceived Voice Tremor Severity.
    Maryn Y; Leblans M; Zarowski A; Barkmeier-Kraemer J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3689-3705. PubMed ID: 31619112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An acoustic-perceptual study of vocal tremor.
    Anand S; Shrivastav R; Wingate JM; Chheda NN
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):811.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22921293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV).
    Sauder C; Bretl M; Eadie T
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):557-566. PubMed ID: 28169094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
    Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a telephone screening tool for spasmodic dysphonia and vocal fold tremor.
    Johnson DM; Hapner ER; Klein AM; Pethan M; Johns MM
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 24962230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of anchors on reliability of endoscopic tremor ratings.
    Lowell SY; Kelley RT; Busekroos L; Voleti R; Hosbach-Cannon CJ; Colton RH; Mihaila D
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Feb; 127(2):411-416. PubMed ID: 27075631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effects of Remote Signal Transmission and Recording on Acoustical Measures of Simulated Essential Vocal Tremor: Considerations for Remote Treatment Research and Telepractice.
    Lester-Smith RA; Jebaily CG; Story BH
    J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):325-336. PubMed ID: 34702610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vocal tremor analysis with the Vocal Demodulator.
    Winholtz WS; Ramig LO
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):562-73. PubMed ID: 1608247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder.
    Lee YW; Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Dec; 43(4):175-180. PubMed ID: 29671679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physiologic and acoustic patterns of essential vocal tremor.
    Lester RA; Barkmeier-Kraemer J; Story BH
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):422-32. PubMed ID: 23490130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of vocal tremor during sustained phonation compared with sentence context.
    Lederle A; Barkmeier-Kraemer J; Finnegan E
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):668.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22521323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality.
    Eskenazi L; Childers DG; Hicks DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 2359270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.
    Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
    J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
    Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
    J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
    Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
    Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.