271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31619115)
1. The Contribution of Individual Differences in Memory Span and Language Ability to Spatial Release From Masking in Young Children.
MacCutcheon D; Pausch F; Füllgrabe C; Eccles R; van der Linde J; Panebianco C; Fels J; Ljung R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 31619115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of language, spatial factors, masker type and memory span on speech-in-noise thresholds in sequential bilingual children.
MacCutcheon D; Pausch F; Fels J; Ljung R
Scand J Psychol; 2018 Dec; 59(6):567-577. PubMed ID: 30137681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
Jones JA; Freyman RL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
Wu X; Yang Z; Huang Y; Chen J; Li L; Daneman M; Schneider BA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.
Besser J; Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):75-93. PubMed ID: 23945955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults.
Johnstone PM; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2177-89. PubMed ID: 17069314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH; Roush PA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.
Corbin NE; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):223-235. PubMed ID: 27787392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
Heeke P; Vermiglio AJ; Bulla E; Velappan K; Fang X
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners.
Stuart A; Zhang J; Swink S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 20388450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sentence Recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble.
Vermiglio AJ; Herring CC; Heeke P; Post CE; Fang X
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30461388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing.
Buss E; Leibold LJ; Porter HL; Grose JH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2650. PubMed ID: 28464682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
