These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31619225)
1. Customized versus population birth weight charts for identification of newborns at risk of long-term adverse cardio-metabolic and respiratory outcomes: a population-based prospective cohort study. Erkamp JS; Jaddoe VWV; Mulders AGMGJ; Steegers EAP; Reiss IKM; Duijts L; Gaillard R BMC Med; 2019 Oct; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 31619225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies. Chiossi G; Pedroza C; Costantine MM; Truong VTT; Gargano G; Saade GR Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 50(2):156-166. PubMed ID: 27935148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "INTERGROWTH21st vs customized fetal growth curves in the assessment of the neonatal nutritional status: a retrospective cohort study of gestational diabetes". Fernández-Alba JJ; Soto Pazos E; Moreno Cortés R; Vilar Sánchez Á; González Macías C; Castillo Lara M; Moreno Corral L; Sainz Bueno JA BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Mar; 20(1):139. PubMed ID: 32131758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome. Sovio U; Smith GCS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S738-S744. PubMed ID: 29199029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small and large size for gestational age at birth, infant growth, and childhood overweight. Taal HR; Vd Heijden AJ; Steegers EA; Hofman A; Jaddoe VW Obesity (Silver Spring); 2013 Jun; 21(6):1261-8. PubMed ID: 23666877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of small for gestational age by population-based and customized growth charts in newborns of obese and normal-weight primiparous women. Lauring JR; Gupta M; Kunselman AR; Repke JT; Pauli JM J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(21):3570-4. PubMed ID: 26755451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FIGO position paper on reference charts for fetal growth and size at birth: Which one to use? Visser GHA; Nicholson WK; Barnea ER; Ramasauskaite D; Nassar AH; Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Feb; 152(2):148-151. PubMed ID: 33247958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing the assumptions of customized intrauterine growth charts using national birth studies. Hocquette A; Monier I; Blondel B; Dufourg MN; Heude B; Zeitlin J Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Apr; 101(4):405-416. PubMed ID: 35224718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts. Hoftiezer L; Hof MHP; Dijs-Elsinga J; Hogeveen M; Hukkelhoven CWPM; van Lingen RA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):383.e1-383.e17. PubMed ID: 30576661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study. Vieira MC; Relph S; Persson M; Seed PT; Pasupathy D PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002902. PubMed ID: 31539391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Customized and non-customized live-born birth-weight curves of single and uncomplicated pregnancies from the Burgundy perinatal network. Part I - methodology. Rousseau T; Durand-Maison O; Labruere-Chazal C; Tabard F; Jebrane A; Martz O; Benzenine E; Cottenet J; Sagot P J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 46(7):587-590. PubMed ID: 28529058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Does customized weight curves improve prenatal diagnosis of fetuses small for gestational age in a high-risk population?]. Lerebours A; Callec R; Lauria E; Morel O Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Jun; 45(6):335-339. PubMed ID: 28552750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term. Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study. Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Customized growth charts for twin gestations to optimize identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses at risk of intrauterine fetal death. Odibo AO; Cahill AG; Goetzinger KR; Harper LM; Tuuli MG; Macones GA Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 23334992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association between pregnancy complications and small-for-gestational-age birth weight defined by customized fetal growth standard versus a population-based standard. Odibo AO; Francis A; Cahill AG; Macones GA; Crane JP; Gardosi J J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Mar; 24(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 20698736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A customised fetal growth and birthweight standard for Qatar: a population-based cohort study. Farrell T; Minisha F; Khenyab N; Ali NM; Al Obaidly S; Yaqoub SA; Pallivalappil AR; Al-Dewik N; AlRifai H; Hugh O; Gardosi J J Perinat Med; 2024 Oct; 52(8):878-885. PubMed ID: 39167534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of maternal age, height, BMI and ethnicity on birth weight: an Italian multicenter study. Spada E; Chiossi G; Coscia A; Monari F; Facchinetti F J Perinat Med; 2018 Nov; 46(9):1016-1021. PubMed ID: 29257759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of fetal growth by customized growth charts. Gaillard R; Jaddoe VW Ann Nutr Metab; 2014; 65(2-3):149-55. PubMed ID: 25413653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]