232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31619657)
1. Diagnostic methods and treatment strategies of impacted maxillary canines: A literature review.
Grybienė V; Juozėnaitė D; Kubiliūtė K
Stomatologija; 2019; 21(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 31619657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses.
Yan B; Sun Z; Fields H; Wang L; Luo L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 23561415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A review of the diagnosis and management of impacted maxillary canines.
Bedoya MM; Park JH
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Dec; 140(12):1485-93. PubMed ID: 19955066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the root apex position of impacted maxillary canines on panoramic films.
Kim SH; Son WS; Yamaguchi T; Maki K; Kim SS; Park SB; Kim YI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):489-493. PubMed ID: 28962733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Three-dimensional localization and assessment of maxillary palatal impacted canines with cone-beam computed tomography].
Yu JN; Gu YG; Zhao CY; Liu K; Mo SC; Li H; Pan CQ; Wang L
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Feb; 24(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 25858386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The assessment of impacted maxillary canine position with panoramic radiography and cone beam CT.
Jung YH; Liang H; Benson BW; Flint DJ; Cho BH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jul; 41(5):356-60. PubMed ID: 22116130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of impacted maxillary canines on root resorption of lateral incisors : A cone beam computed tomography study.
Ucar FI; Celebi AA; Tan E; Topcuoğlu T; Sekerci AE
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):233-240. PubMed ID: 28204849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT-based interpretations of maxillary impacted canines compared to those of conventional radiography: An in vitro study.
Hajeer MY; Al-Homsi HK; Alfailany DT; Murad RMT
Int Orthod; 2022 Jun; 20(2):100639. PubMed ID: 35606269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines.
Haney E; Gansky SA; Lee JS; Johnson E; Maki K; Miller AJ; Huang JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):590-7. PubMed ID: 20451777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. To what extent are impacted canines associated with root resorption of the adjacent tooth?: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Schroder AGD; Guariza-Filho O; de Araujo CM; Ruellas AC; Tanaka OM; Porporatti AL
J Am Dent Assoc; 2018 Sep; 149(9):765-777.e8. PubMed ID: 30165975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Three-Dimensional and Conventional Orthodontic Imaging Modalities for Localization of Impacted Maxillary Canines in Patients With Alveolar Cleft.
Padisar P; Tofangchiha M; Salari B; Oveisi S
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Feb; 58(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 32783463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional evaluation of angular, linear, and resorption features of maxillary impacted canines on cone-beam computed tomography.
Dağsuyu İM; Kahraman F; Okşayan R
Oral Radiol; 2018 Jan; 34(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 30484094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographical characteristics and traction duration of impacted maxillary canine requiring surgical exposure and orthodontic traction: a cross-sectional study.
Yang JS; Cha JY; Lee JY; Choi SH
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19183. PubMed ID: 36357464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of methods for localization of impacted maxillary canines by panoramic radiographs.
An S; Wang J; Li J; Cheng Q; Jiang CM; Wang YT; Huang YF; Yu WJ; Gou YC; Xiao L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130129. PubMed ID: 23894190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of the maxillary dimensions and lateral incisor anatomy on the palatal impaction of maxillary permanent canines: A three-dimensional case-control study.
Oliveira TCP; Copello FM; Paes-Souza SA; Castro ACR; Nojima LI; Gonçalves Nojima MDC
Int Orthod; 2023 Dec; 21(4):100804. PubMed ID: 37659282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of surgical exposure technique, age, and grade of impaction on ankylosis of an impacted canine, and the effect of rapid palatal expansion on eruption: A prospective clinical study.
Koutzoglou SI; Kostaki A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):342-52. PubMed ID: 23452968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary sinus volume in patients with impacted canines.
Oz AZ; Oz AA; El H; Palomo JM
Angle Orthod; 2017 Jan; 87(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 27463699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relationship between Dental Follicle Width and Maxillary Impacted Canines' Descriptive and Resorptive Features Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Dağsuyu İM; Okşayan R; Kahraman F; Aydın M; Bayrakdar İŞ; Uğurlu M
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():2938691. PubMed ID: 29226129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional position of impacted maxillary canines: Prevalence, associated pathology and introduction to a new classification system.
Grisar K; Piccart F; Al-Rimawi AS; Basso I; Politis C; Jacobs R
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Feb; 5(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 31943949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
