These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31621129)
1. The wrist is not the brain: Estimation of sleep by clinical and consumer wearable actigraphy devices is impacted by multiple patient- and device-specific factors. Danzig R; Wang M; Shah A; Trotti LM J Sleep Res; 2020 Feb; 29(1):e12926. PubMed ID: 31621129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a Consumer Sleep Wearable Device With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in Adolescents Across Sleep Opportunity Manipulations. Lee XK; Chee NIYN; Ong JL; Teo TB; van Rijn E; Lo JC; Chee MWL J Clin Sleep Med; 2019 Sep; 15(9):1337-1346. PubMed ID: 31538605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Commercial Wrist-Based and Smartphone Accelerometers, Actigraphy, and PSG in a Clinical Cohort of Children and Adolescents. Toon E; Davey MJ; Hollis SL; Nixon GM; Horne RS; Biggs SN J Clin Sleep Med; 2016 Mar; 12(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 26446248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity, potential clinical utility, and comparison of consumer and research-grade activity trackers in Insomnia Disorder I: In-lab validation against polysomnography. Kahawage P; Jumabhoy R; Hamill K; de Zambotti M; Drummond SPA J Sleep Res; 2020 Feb; 29(1):e12931. PubMed ID: 31626361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Sleep-Wake Scoring of a New Wrist-Worn Sleep Monitoring Device. Pigeon WR; Taylor M; Bui A; Oleynk C; Walsh P; Bishop TM J Clin Sleep Med; 2018 Jun; 14(6):1057-1062. PubMed ID: 29852899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ability of the Multisensory Jawbone UP3 to Quantify and Classify Sleep in Patients With Suspected Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence: A Comparison Against Polysomnography and Actigraphy. Cook JD; Prairie ML; Plante DT J Clin Sleep Med; 2018 May; 14(5):841-848. PubMed ID: 29734975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Validity of a New Consumer-Targeted Wrist Device in Sleep Measurement: An Overnight Comparison Against Polysomnography in Children and Adolescents. Pesonen AK; Kuula L J Clin Sleep Med; 2018 Apr; 14(4):585-591. PubMed ID: 29609722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of the accuracy of sleep wearable devices for estimating sleep onset. Scott H; Lack L; Lovato N Sleep Med Rev; 2020 Feb; 49():101227. PubMed ID: 31901524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a consumer fitness-tracking device to assess sleep in adults. de Zambotti M; Claudatos S; Inkelis S; Colrain IM; Baker FC Chronobiol Int; 2015; 32(7):1024-8. PubMed ID: 26158542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PSG Validation of minute-to-minute scoring for sleep and wake periods in a consumer wearable device. Cheung J; Leary EB; Lu H; Zeitzer JM; Mignot E PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238464. PubMed ID: 32941498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detecting sleep using heart rate and motion data from multisensor consumer-grade wearables, relative to wrist actigraphy and polysomnography. Roberts DM; Schade MM; Mathew GM; Gartenberg D; Buxton OM Sleep; 2020 Jul; 43(7):. PubMed ID: 32215550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity, potential clinical utility and comparison of a consumer activity tracker and a research-grade activity tracker in insomnia disorder II: Outside the laboratory. Hamill K; Jumabhoy R; Kahawage P; de Zambotti M; Walters EM; Drummond SPA J Sleep Res; 2020 Feb; 29(1):e12944. PubMed ID: 31680327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of photoplethysmography- and acceleration-based sleep staging in a community sample: comparison with polysomnography and Actiwatch. Liu PK; Ting N; Chiu HC; Lin YC; Liu YT; Ku BW; Lee PL J Clin Sleep Med; 2023 Oct; 19(10):1797-1810. PubMed ID: 37338335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of radio-frequency biomotion sensors and actigraphy versus polysomnography for the assessment of sleep in normal subjects. O'Hare E; Flanagan D; Penzel T; Garcia C; Frohberg D; Heneghan C Sleep Breath; 2015 Mar; 19(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 24614968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Validation Study of a Commercial Wearable Device to Automatically Detect and Estimate Sleep. Miller DJ; Roach GD; Lastella M; Scanlan AT; Bellenger CR; Halson SL; Sargent C Biosensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34201016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating Accuracy in Five Commercial Sleep-Tracking Devices Compared to Research-Grade Actigraphy and Polysomnography. Kainec KA; Caccavaro J; Barnes M; Hoff C; Berlin A; Spencer RMC Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 38276327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of the Fitbit Flex to evaluate sleep in major depressive disorder: A comparison against polysomnography and wrist-worn actigraphy. Cook JD; Prairie ML; Plante DT J Affect Disord; 2017 Aug; 217():299-305. PubMed ID: 28448949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three Contactless Sleep Technologies Compared With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in a Heterogeneous Group of Older Men and Women in a Model of Mild Sleep Disturbance: Sleep Laboratory Study. G Ravindran KK; Della Monica C; Atzori G; Lambert D; Hassanin H; Revell V; Dijk DJ JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2023 Oct; 11():e46338. PubMed ID: 37878360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of multichannel and single-channel wrist-based devices with polysomnography to measure sleep in children and adolescents. Burkart S; Beets MW; Armstrong B; Hunt ET; Dugger R; von Klinggraeff L; Jones A; Brown DE; Weaver RG J Clin Sleep Med; 2021 Apr; 17(4):645-652. PubMed ID: 33174529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of actigraphy and polysomnography to assess effects of zolpidem in a clinical research unit. Peterson BT; Chiao P; Pickering E; Freeman J; Zammit GK; Ding Y; Badura LL Sleep Med; 2012 Apr; 13(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 22317945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]