261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31621146)
21. [Relationship between computerized cardiotocography and perinatal outcomes].
Liu W; Li X; Tang D
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(10):581-4. PubMed ID: 16134517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.
Pinas A; Chandraharan E
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():33-47. PubMed ID: 26165747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does the saltatory pattern on cardiotocograph (CTG) trace really exist? The ZigZag pattern as an alternative definition and its correlation with perinatal outcomes.
Gracia-Perez-Bonfils A; Vigneswaran K; Cuadras D; Chandraharan E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Nov; 34(21):3537-3545. PubMed ID: 31722586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of admission cardiotocography in predicting the obstetric outcome in term antenatal women: A prospective observational study.
Kumar N; Yadav M
J Mother Child; 2022 Mar; 26(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 36321214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cardiotocography and perinatal outcome in women with and without meconium stained liquor.
Odongo BE; Ndavi PM; Gachuno OW; Sequeira E
East Afr Med J; 2010 May; 87(5):199-204. PubMed ID: 23057282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. National survey of routines for intrapartum fetal monitoring in Norway.
Kaasen A; Aanstad KJ; Pay ASD; Økland I; Blix E
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Mar; 98(3):390-395. PubMed ID: 30375643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Indirect standard cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus indirect quantitative cardiotocography--a randomized comparative study in intrapartum monitoring].
Ignatov P; Atanasov B
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(5):3-10. PubMed ID: 23234029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hazard and cumulative incidence of umbilical cord metabolic acidemia at birth in fetuses experiencing the second stage of labor and pathologic intrapartum fetal heart rate requiring expedited delivery.
Cavoretto PI; Seidenari A; Farina A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 307(4):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 35596749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The temporal effect of Category II fetal monitoring on neonatal outcomes.
Weissbach T; Heusler I; Ovadia M; David L; Daykan Y; Schreiber F; Biron-Shental T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Oct; 229():8-14. PubMed ID: 30096466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The clinical significance of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in twins.
Dera-Szymanowska A; Polska M; Markwitz W; Moczko J; Horst N; Szymanowski K
Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(10):839-844. PubMed ID: 36378125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intrapartum cardiotocography: an exploratory analysis of interpretational variation.
Amadori R; Vaianella E; Tosi M; Baronchelli P; Surico D; Remorgida V
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 42(7):2753-2757. PubMed ID: 35950331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Potti S; Berghella V
Am J Perinatol; 2012 Sep; 29(8):657-64. PubMed ID: 22639349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Estimation of neonatal outcome artery pH value according to CTG interpretation of the last 60 min before delivery: a retrospective study. Can the outcome pH value be predicted?
Kundu S; Kuehnle E; Schippert C; von Ehr J; Hillemanns P; Staboulidou I
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Nov; 296(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 28879450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cardiotocography as a predictor of fetal outcome in women presenting with reduced fetal movement.
Daly N; Brennan D; Foley M; O'Herlihy C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21899943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical practice guidelines for intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation: A systematic review.
Brown J; Kanagaretnam D; Zen M
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Jun; 63(3):278-289. PubMed ID: 36898674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography.
Galazios G; Tripsianis G; Tsikouras P; Koutlaki N; Liberis V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Feb; 281(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 19455348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Longitudinal evaluation of computerized cardiotocographic parameters throughout pregnancy in normal fetuses: a prospective cohort study.
Amorim-Costa C; Costa-Santos C; Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Oct; 95(10):1143-52. PubMed ID: 27238561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients.
Kwee A; van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW; Veerman J; Dekkers AH; Visser GH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 15280112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Continuous monitoring of fetal oxygen saturation (FSpO2) using intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry (IFPO) in the diagnosis of acute fetal hypoxia].
Roztocil A; Miklica J; Kucera M; Ventruba P
Ceska Gynekol; 2000 Jul; 65(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 11039226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.
Westerhuis ME; Moons KG; van Beek E; Bijvoet SM; Drogtrop AP; van Geijn HP; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Oei SG; Porath MM; Rijnders RJ; Schuitemaker NW; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Willekes C; Kwee A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul; 7():13. PubMed ID: 17655764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
