These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31621360)

  • 1. Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity.
    Cutter MG; Martin AE; Sturt P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1146-1164. PubMed ID: 31621360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word skipping in Chinese reading: The role of high-frequency preview and syntactic felicity.
    Zang C; Du H; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):603-620. PubMed ID: 31246059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading.
    Payne BR; Stites MC; Federmeier KD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1839-1857. PubMed ID: 27428778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.
    Staub A; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):110-127. PubMed ID: 29648870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of foveal lexical processing load on parafoveal preview and saccadic targeting during Chinese reading.
    Zhang M; Liversedge SP; Bai X; Yan G; Zang C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun; 45(6):812-825. PubMed ID: 31120302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.
    Degno F; Loberg O; Zang C; Zhang M; Donnelly N; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):453-474. PubMed ID: 30335444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
    Schotter ER; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Fu Y; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1831-1841. PubMed ID: 30475051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is orthographic information from multiple parafoveal words processed in parallel: An eye-tracking study.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 28383965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 32730070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects of emotional word semantics in reading Chinese sentences: evidence from eye movements.
    Yan M; Sommer W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1237-43. PubMed ID: 25581226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What are the costs of degraded parafoveal previews during silent reading?
    Vasilev MR; Slattery TJ; Kirkby JA; Angele B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):371-386. PubMed ID: 28661179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival analyses reveal how early phonological processing affects eye movements during reading.
    Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1316-1344. PubMed ID: 30047769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility?
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 26752734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The function/content word distinction and eye movements in reading.
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jun; 50(6):967-984. PubMed ID: 37883049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On relative word length and transposed-word effects.
    Wen Y; Mirault J; Grainger J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Sep; 50(9):934-941. PubMed ID: 39146050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses.
    Staub A
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 20427040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.