These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31621670)
1. Comparative evaluation of hemodynamic responses and ease of intubation with airtraq video laryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope in patients with ischemic heart disease. Varsha AV; George G; Pillai R; Sahajanandan R Ann Card Anaesth; 2019; 22(4):365-371. PubMed ID: 31621670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Airtraq® reduces the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation using single-lumen tubes in adults compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Hoshijima H; Maruyama K; Mihara T; Mieda T; Shiga T; Nagasaka H J Clin Anesth; 2018 Jun; 47():86-94. PubMed ID: 29635148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes in morbidly obese patients: a randomized and prospective study. Castillo-Monzón CG; Marroquín-Valz HA; Fernández-Villacañas-Marín M; Moreno-Cascales M; García-Rojo B; Candia-Arana CA J Clin Anesth; 2017 Feb; 36():136-141. PubMed ID: 28183552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomised comparative study of the effect of Airtraq optical laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope on intraocular pressure in non-ophthalmic surgery. Das B; Samal RK; Ghosh A; Kundu R Braz J Anesthesiol; 2016; 66(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 26768925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation: a randomised clinical trial. Wasem S; Lazarus M; Hain J; Festl J; Kranke P; Roewer N; Lange M; Smul TM Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Apr; 30(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 23442315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation with Truview PCD™, McGrath® and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized prospective study. Tempe DK; Chaudhary K; Diwakar A; Datt V; Virmani S; Tomar AS; Mohandas A; Mohire VB Ann Card Anaesth; 2016; 19(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26750677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants. Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison between the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes for routine airway management by experienced anesthesiologists: a randomized clinical trial. Chalkeidis O; Kotsovolis G; Kalakonas A; Filippidou M; Triantafyllou C; Vaikos D; Koutsioumpas E Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2010 Mar; 48(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 20434108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A comparison of Airtraq™ laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy in adult patients with immobilized cervical spine]. Amor M; Nabil S; Bensghir M; Moussaoui A; Kabbaj S; Kamili ND; Maazouzi W Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 May; 32(5):296-301. PubMed ID: 23561715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indirect versus direct laryngoscopy for routine nasotracheal intubation. Puchner W; Drabauer L; Kern K; Mayer C; Bierbaumer J; Rehak PH; Gombotz H J Clin Anesth; 2011 Jun; 23(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 21663811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of laryngoscope types on hemodynamic response and optic nerve sheath diameter. McCoy, Macintosh, and C-MAC video-laryngoscope. Küçükosman G; Aydın BG; Gülçek N; Okyay RD; Pişkin Ö; Ayoğlu H Saudi Med J; 2020 Sep; 41(9):930-937. PubMed ID: 32893274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation Comparing the Airtraq(®) with Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Cardiac Surgical Patients. Gavrilovska-Brzanov A; Jarallah MA; Cogliati A; Mojsova-Mijovska M; Mijuskovic D; Slaveski D Acta Inform Med; 2015 Oct; 23(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 26635435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial comparing performance of Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes. Ndoko SK; Amathieu R; Tual L; Polliand C; Kamoun W; El Housseini L; Champault G; Dhonneur G Br J Anaesth; 2008 Feb; 100(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 18211999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison between the Airtraq, X-Lite, and direct laryngoscopes for thyroid surgery: a randomized clinical trial]. Bensghir M; Chouikh C; Bouhabba N; Fjjouji S; Kasouati J; Azendour H; Kamili ND Can J Anaesth; 2013 Apr; 60(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 23264012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of Macintosh and Airtraq Laryngoscopes for Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization Using Manual In Line Axial Stabilization: A Prospective Randomized Study. Vijayakumar V; Rao S; Shetty N J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 28(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 26325513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraocular pressure changes: the McGrath video laryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope; a randomized trial. Karaman T; Dogru S; Karaman S; Demir S; Kaya Z; Suren M; Arici S; Kahveci M; Alim S J Clin Anesth; 2016 Nov; 34():358-64. PubMed ID: 27687410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of three unchannelled videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a randomised, controlled trial. Kleine-Brueggeney M; Buttenberg M; Greif R; Nabecker S; Theiler L Anaesthesia; 2017 Mar; 72(3):370-378. PubMed ID: 27882535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of Airtraq laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope by experienced anesthesiologists. Saracoglu KT; Acarel M; Umuroglu T; Gogus FY Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2014 Jun; 22(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 25137867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Airtraq video laryngoscope as a rescue device after difficult direct laryngoscopy. Iglesias González JL; Gómez-Ríos MA; Poveda Marina JL; Calvo-Vecino JM Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed); 2018 Dec; 65(10):552-557. PubMed ID: 30177221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]