These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31621841)

  • 1. Patch-DCA: improved protein interface prediction by utilizing structural information and clustering DCA scores.
    Vajdi A; Zarringhalam K; Haspel N
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(5):1460-1467. PubMed ID: 31621841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of residue pairing in interacting β-strands from a predicted residue contact map.
    Mao W; Wang T; Zhang W; Gong H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):146. PubMed ID: 29673311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of several key factors influencing deep learning-based inter-residue contact prediction.
    Wu T; Hou J; Adhikari B; Cheng J
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(4):1091-1098. PubMed ID: 31504181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. aPRBind: protein-RNA interface prediction by combining sequence and I-TASSER model-based structural features learned with convolutional neural networks.
    Liu Y; Gong W; Zhao Y; Deng X; Zhang S; Li C
    Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 37(7):937-942. PubMed ID: 32821925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forecasting residue-residue contact prediction accuracy.
    Wozniak PP; Konopka BM; Xu J; Vriend G; Kotulska M
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 33(21):3405-3414. PubMed ID: 29036497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High precision in protein contact prediction using fully convolutional neural networks and minimal sequence features.
    Jones DT; Kandathil SM
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 34(19):3308-3315. PubMed ID: 29718112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. KScons: a Bayesian approach for protein residue contact prediction using the knob-socket model of protein tertiary structure.
    Li Q; Dahl DB; Vannucci M; Joo H; Tsai JW
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 32(24):3774-3781. PubMed ID: 27559156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ResPRE: high-accuracy protein contact prediction by coupling precision matrix with deep residual neural networks.
    Li Y; Hu J; Zhang C; Yu DJ; Zhang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 35(22):4647-4655. PubMed ID: 31070716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. R2C: improving ab initio residue contact map prediction using dynamic fusion strategy and Gaussian noise filter.
    Yang J; Jin QY; Zhang B; Shen HB
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 32(16):2435-43. PubMed ID: 27153618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model.
    Wang S; Sun S; Li Z; Zhang R; Xu J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005324. PubMed ID: 28056090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep graph learning of inter-protein contacts.
    Xie Z; Xu J
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Jan; 38(4):947-953. PubMed ID: 34755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel methodology on distributed representations of proteins using their interacting ligands.
    Öztürk H; Ozkirimli E; Özgür A
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):i295-i303. PubMed ID: 29949957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate prediction of protein contact maps by coupling residual two-dimensional bidirectional long short-term memory with convolutional neural networks.
    Hanson J; Paliwal K; Litfin T; Yang Y; Zhou Y
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 34(23):4039-4045. PubMed ID: 29931279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving residue-residue contact prediction via low-rank and sparse decomposition of residue correlation matrix.
    Zhang H; Gao Y; Deng M; Wang C; Zhu J; Li SC; Zheng WM; Bu D
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2016 Mar; 472(1):217-22. PubMed ID: 26920058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlated mutations select misfolded from properly folded proteins.
    Wozniak PP; Vriend G; Kotulska M
    Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 33(10):1497-1504. PubMed ID: 28203707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limits and potential of combined folding and docking.
    Pozzati G; Zhu W; Bassot C; Lamb J; Kundrotas P; Elofsson A
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Jan; 38(4):954-961. PubMed ID: 34788800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins.
    Jones DT; Singh T; Kosciolek T; Tetchner S
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 31(7):999-1006. PubMed ID: 25431331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolution of contact prediction: evidence that contact selection in statistical contact prediction is changing.
    Chonofsky M; de Oliveira SHP; Krawczyk K; Deane CM
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1750-1756. PubMed ID: 31693112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bio-knowledge-based filters improve residue-residue contact prediction accuracy.
    Wozniak PP; Pelc J; Skrzypecki M; Vriend G; Kotulska M
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 34(21):3675-3683. PubMed ID: 29850768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving prediction of protein secondary structure, backbone angles, solvent accessibility and contact numbers by using predicted contact maps and an ensemble of recurrent and residual convolutional neural networks.
    Hanson J; Paliwal K; Litfin T; Yang Y; Zhou Y
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 35(14):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 30535134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.