These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31622064)

  • 1. The long-term social value of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.
    Sexton Ward A; Kabiri M; Yucel A; Silverstein AR; van Eijndhoven E; Bowers C; Bensink M; Goldman D
    Am J Manag Care; 2019 Oct; 25(10):486-493. PubMed ID: 31622064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?
    Skedgel C; Rayson D; Younis T
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jan; 24(1):387-394. PubMed ID: 26081595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Mądry R; Popławska L; Haslbauer F; Šafanda M; Ghizdavescu D; Benkovicova J; Csőszi T; Mihaylov G; Niepel D; Jaeger C; Frkanova I; Macovei A; Staudigl C
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2016 Apr; 128(7-8):238-47. PubMed ID: 26745973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
    Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia among breast cancer and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients under Taiwan's national health insurance system.
    Wen TJ; Wen YW; Chien CR; Chiang SC; Hsu WW; Shen LJ; Hsiao FY
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 23(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 27491287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adherence to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guidelines to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy--a representative sample survey in Germany.
    Link H; Nietsch J; Kerkmann M; Ortner P;
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jan; 24(1):367-376. PubMed ID: 26081593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the social value of G-CSF therapies in the United States.
    Vanderpuye-Orgle J; Sexton Ward A; Huber C; Kamson C; Jena AB
    Am J Manag Care; 2016 Oct; 22(10):e343-e349. PubMed ID: 28557522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of Primary Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia During Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
    Yu JL; Chan K; Kurin M; Pasetka M; Kiss A; Sridhar SS; Warner E
    Breast J; 2015; 21(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 26387577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) patterns of use in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Choi MR; Solid CA; Chia VM; Blaes AH; Page JH; Barron R; Arneson TJ
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Jun; 22(6):1619-28. PubMed ID: 24492928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risks and consequences of travel burden on prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration and incidence of febrile neutropenia in an aged Medicare population.
    Stephens JM; Bensink M; Bowers C; Hollenbeak CS
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2019 Feb; 35(2):229-240. PubMed ID: 29661043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factors for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
    Renner P; Milazzo S; Liu JP; Zwahlen M; Birkmann J; Horneber M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD007913. PubMed ID: 23076939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours.
    Aapro MS; Bohlius J; Cameron DA; Dal Lago L; Donnelly JP; Kearney N; Lyman GH; Pettengell R; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Walewski J; Weber DC; Zielinski C;
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jan; 47(1):8-32. PubMed ID: 21095116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pharmacoeconomics of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a critical review.
    Barnes G; Pathak A; Schwartzberg L
    Adv Ther; 2014 Jul; 31(7):683-95. PubMed ID: 24989316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of primary versus secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
    Ramsey SD; Liu Z; Boer R; Sullivan SD; Malin J; Doan QV; Dubois RW; Lyman GH
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18673353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.
    Dale DC
    Drugs; 2002; 62 Suppl 1():1-15. PubMed ID: 12479591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice.
    Averin A; Silvia A; Lamerato L; Richert-Boe K; Kaur M; Sundaresan D; Shah N; Hatfield M; Lawrence T; Lyman GH; Weycker D
    Support Care Cancer; 2021 Apr; 29(4):2179-2186. PubMed ID: 32880732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF in early-stage breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in China].
    Xia W; Wang SS; Hu H; Zhao FL; Xu F; Hong RX; Jiang KK; Yuan ZY; Shi YX; Zhao K; Huang JJ; Xue C; Bi XW; Lu QY; An X; Zhang JM
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 42(10):861-867. PubMed ID: 33113628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.