These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3162246)

  • 1. Description and clinical evaluation of a new computerized periodontal probe--the Florida probe.
    Gibbs CH; Hirschfeld JW; Lee JG; Low SB; Magnusson I; Thousand RR; Yerneni P; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Feb; 15(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 3162246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between electronic and visual readings of pocket depths with a newly developed constant force probe.
    Magnusson I; Fuller WW; Heins PJ; Rau CF; Gibbs CH; Marks RG; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 3162464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
    J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring clinical attachment: reproducibility of relative measurements with an electronic probe.
    Clark WB; Yang MC; Magnusson I
    J Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 63(10):831-8. PubMed ID: 1403590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of manual and controlled-force attachment-level measurements.
    Reddy MS; Palcanis KG; Geurs NC
    J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 24(12):920-6. PubMed ID: 9442430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of an electronic probe in relative attachment level measurements.
    Yang MC; Marks RG; Magnusson I; Clouser B; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):541-8. PubMed ID: 1447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attachment level measurements with a constant force electronic probe.
    Magnusson I; Clark WB; Marks RG; Gibbs CH; Manouchehr-Pour M; Low SB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 3162465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of attachment level measurements with two models of the Florida Probe.
    Marks RG; Low SB; Taylor M; Baggs R; Magnusson I; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 18(10):780-4. PubMed ID: 1753003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra - and inter-examiner reproducibility in constant force probing.
    Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Dec; 22(12):918-22. PubMed ID: 8613559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probe penetration in relation to the connective tissue attachment level: influence of tine shape and probing force.
    Bulthuis HM; Barendregt DS; Timmerman MF; Loos BG; van der Velden U
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 May; 25(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 9650880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical study of an electronic constant force periodontal probe.
    Tupta-Veselicky L; Famili P; Ceravolo FJ; Zullo T
    J Periodontol; 1994 Jun; 65(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 8083795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of the validity of a constant force electronic probe in measuring probing depths.
    Hull PS; Clerehugh V; Ghassemi-Aval A
    J Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 66(10):848-51. PubMed ID: 8537866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
    Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A periodontal probe with automated cemento--enamel junction detection-design and clinical trials.
    Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Captain K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 1855793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter- and intra-examiner variability using standard and constant force periodontal probes.
    Walsh TF; Saxby MS
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Mar; 16(3):140-3. PubMed ID: 2723096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative probing with an electronic and a manual periodontal probe].
    Becherer CF; Rateitschak KH; Hefti AF
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1993; 103(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 8322056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Site-specific attachment level change detected by physical probing in untreated chronic adult periodontitis: review of studies 1982-1997.
    Breen HJ; Johnson NW; Rogers PA
    J Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 70(3):312-28. PubMed ID: 10225549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constant force probing with and without a stent in untreated periodontal disease: the clinical reproducibility problem and possible sources of error.
    Watts T
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Aug; 14(7):407-11. PubMed ID: 3476518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of pocket depth and attachment level measurements when using a flexible splint.
    Isidor F; Karring T; Attström R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Nov; 11(10):662-8. PubMed ID: 6594353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.