155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3162274)
1. Bone-implant interface structures after nontapping and tapping insertion of screw-type titanium alloy endosseous implants.
Satomi K; Akagawa Y; Nikai H; Tsuru H
J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Mar; 59(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 3162274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial interface between submerged hydroxyapatite-coated titanium alloy implant and mandibular bone after nontapping and tapping insertions in monkeys.
Akagawa Y; Satomi K; Nikai H; Tsuru H
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 2160012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone of immediate or delayed occlusal-loaded non-splinted implants in the posterior mandible--an experimental study in monkeys.
Stokholm R; Isidor F; Nyengaard JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 24118392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implants in dogs.
Deporter DA; Watson PA; Pilliar RM; Melcher AH; Winslow J; Howley TP; Hansel P; Maniatopoulos C; Rodriguez A; Abdulla D
J Dent Res; 1986 Aug; 65(8):1064-70. PubMed ID: 3525627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. I. Histological aspects.
Brunski JB; Moccia AF; Pollack SR; Korostoff E; Trachtenberg DI
J Dent Res; 1979 Oct; 58(10):1953-69. PubMed ID: 291620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Plasma-coated titanium screw as an endosseous implant; method of implantation and postoperative care].
Ledermann P
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 May; 35(5):577-9. PubMed ID: 6935031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces.
Schroeder A; van der Zypen E; Stich H; Sutter F
J Maxillofac Surg; 1981 Feb; 9(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 6939769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immediate loading of titanium plasma-sprayed implants: an histologic analysis in monkeys.
Piattelli A; Corigliano M; Scarano A; Costigliola G; Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 9579618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone reaction adjacent to microplasma-sprayed calcium phosphate-coated oral implants subjected to an occlusal load, an experimental study in the dog.
Junker R; Manders PJ; Wolke J; Borisov Y; Braceras I; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 21070381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of Tapered and Nontapered Implants in the Minipig.
Cochran D; Stavropoulos A; Obrecht M; Pippenger B; Dard M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1341-1347. PubMed ID: 27861658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The reaction of peri-implant tissues to titanium alloy and apatite-coated implants during the healing phase.
Yamada S; Matsue M; Lee JH
Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1988 Dec; 30(4):1021-31. PubMed ID: 3270653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Porous titanium endosseous dental implants in Rhesus monkeys: microradiography and histological evaluation.
Young FA; Spector M; Kresch CH
J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 Nov; 13(6):843-56. PubMed ID: 117007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The advantages of coated titanium implants prepared by radiofrequency sputtering from hydroxyapatite.
Cooley DR; Van Dellen AF; Burgess JO; Windeler AS
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jan; 67(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 1312597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstruction of the edentulous mandible.
Babbush CA
Int Dent J; 1985 Dec; 35(4):266-76. PubMed ID: 3912328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
