These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31622797)

  • 1. A bayesian approach to the spectral F-Test: Application to auditory steady-state responses.
    Romao M; Tierra-Criollo CJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jan; 183():105100. PubMed ID: 31622797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhanced Auditory Steady-State Response Using an Optimized Chirp Stimulus-Evoked Paradigm.
    Liu X; Liu S; Guo D; Sheng Y; Ke Y; An X; He F; Ming D
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 30759874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory steady state responses in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults: an analysis of between-session amplitude and latency repeatability, test time, and F ratio detection paradigms.
    Wilding TS; McKay CM; Baker RJ; Kluk K
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):267-78. PubMed ID: 21909024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phase stability of auditory steady state responses in newborn infants.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; John MS
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):593-604. PubMed ID: 21422930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of the detection paradigm in recording auditory steady-state responses.
    Luts H; Van Dun B; Alaerts J; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):638-50. PubMed ID: 18469712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective detection of auditory steady-state evoked potentials based on mutual information.
    Bidelman GM; Bhagat SP
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):313-9. PubMed ID: 26924597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection efficiency of auditory steady state evoked by modulated noise.
    Santos TS; Silva JJ; Lins OG; Melges DB; Tierra-Criollo CJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():125-31. PubMed ID: 27262450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of frequency specific auditory steady-state response using amplitude modulation with 2-order exponential envelope.
    Cevallos-Larrea P; Pereira T; Santos W; Frota SM; Infantosi AF; Ichinose RM; Tierra-Criollo C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():3414-3117. PubMed ID: 28269036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses.
    Attias J; Karawani H; Shemesh R; Nageris B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 24509531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and time efficiency of two ASSR analysis methods using clinical test protocols.
    Vander Werff KR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):433-52. PubMed ID: 19928397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of auditory threshold using Multiple Magnitude-Squared Coherence and amplitude modulated tones monaural stimulation around 40 Hz.
    Silva GM; Antunes F; Henrique CS; Felix LB
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jun; 159():71-76. PubMed ID: 29650320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural Interaction Effects of 30-50 Hz Auditory Steady State Responses.
    Gransier R; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e305-e315. PubMed ID: 28358747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between loudness growth function and auditory steady-state response in normal-hearing subjects.
    Ménard M; Gallégo S; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L; Thai-Van H
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):105-13. PubMed ID: 18093768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kalman Filter Based Estimation of Auditory Steady State Response Parameters.
    Luke R; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Mar; 25(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 27071180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Faster automatic ASSR detection using sequential tests.
    Zanotelli T; Antunes F; Simpson DM; Mazoni Andrade Marçal Mendes E; Felix LB
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):631-639. PubMed ID: 32091286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sorted averaging improves quality of auditory steady-state responses.
    Rahne T; Verhey JL; Mühler R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 May; 216(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 23603663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiometric threshold screening method using envelope detection filters of intensity ramping click auditory steady-state responses.
    Açikgöz N; Ozdamar O; Delgado RE; Bohórquez J
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4983-6. PubMed ID: 17947124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multichannel search strategy for improving the detection of auditory steady-state response.
    Antunes F; Zanotelli T; Simpson DM; Felix LB
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Feb; 59(2):391-399. PubMed ID: 33495982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.