219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31624209)
1. Hierarchical interlocked orthogonal faulting in the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence.
Ross ZE; Idini B; Jia Z; Stephenson OL; Zhong M; Wang X; Zhan Z; Simons M; Fielding EJ; Yun SH; Hauksson E; Moore AW; Liu Z; Jung J
Science; 2019 Oct; 366(6463):346-351. PubMed ID: 31624209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abundant off-fault seismicity and orthogonal structures in the San Jacinto fault zone.
Ross ZE; Hauksson E; Ben-Zion Y
Sci Adv; 2017 Mar; 3(3):e1601946. PubMed ID: 28345036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatiotemporal Variations of the Frequency-Magnitude Distribution in the 2019
Sardeli E; Michas G; Pavlou K; Vallianatos F
Entropy (Basel); 2023 Dec; 25(12):. PubMed ID: 38136492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence.
Kato A; Nakamura K; Hiyama Y
Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2016; 92(8):358-371. PubMed ID: 27725474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks.
Chen X; Nakata N; Pennington C; Haffener J; Chang JC; He X; Zhan Z; Ni S; Walter JI
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4945. PubMed ID: 28694472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes.
Gao Y; Duan H; Zhang Y; Chen J; Jian H; Wu R; Yin W
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14188. PubMed ID: 34244533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complex multifault rupture during the 2016
Hamling IJ; Hreinsdóttir S; Clark K; Elliott J; Liang C; Fielding E; Litchfield N; Villamor P; Wallace L; Wright TJ; D'Anastasio E; Bannister S; Burbidge D; Denys P; Gentle P; Howarth J; Mueller C; Palmer N; Pearson C; Power W; Barnes P; Barrell DJ; Van Dissen R; Langridge R; Little T; Nicol A; Pettinga J; Rowland J; Stirling M
Science; 2017 Apr; 356(6334):. PubMed ID: 28336563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Were changes in stress state responsible for the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquakes?
Nanjo KZ
Nat Commun; 2020 Jun; 11(1):3082. PubMed ID: 32555220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A great earthquake doublet and seismic stress transfer cycle in the central Kuril islands.
Ammon CJ; Kanamori H; Lay T
Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7178):561-5. PubMed ID: 18235499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. En échelon and orthogonal fault ruptures of the 11 April 2012 great intraplate earthquakes.
Yue H; Lay T; Koper KD
Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):245-9. PubMed ID: 23023129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Earthquake dynamics. Supershear rupture in a M(w) 6.7 aftershock of the 2013 Sea of Okhotsk earthquake.
Zhan Z; Helmberger DV; Kanamori H; Shearer PM
Science; 2014 Jul; 345(6193):204-7. PubMed ID: 25013073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake slip distribution controlled by fault geometry inherited from Independence dike swarm.
Nevitt JM; Brooks BA; Hardebeck JL; Aagaard BT
Nat Commun; 2023 Mar; 14(1):1546. PubMed ID: 36941244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fast and slow intraplate ruptures during the 19 October 2020 magnitude 7.6 Shumagin earthquake.
Bai Y; Liu C; Lay T; Cheung KF; Yamazaki Y
Nat Commun; 2023 Apr; 14(1):2015. PubMed ID: 37037813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Irregular rupture process of the 2022 Taitung, Taiwan, earthquake sequence.
Yagi Y; Okuwaki R; Enescu B; Lu J
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1107. PubMed ID: 36670137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cascading and pulse-like ruptures during the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes in the Eastern California Shear Zone.
Chen K; Avouac JP; Aati S; Milliner C; Zheng F; Shi C
Nat Commun; 2020 Jan; 11(1):22. PubMed ID: 31911581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamics, interactions and delays of the 2019 Ridgecrest rupture sequence.
Taufiqurrahman T; Gabriel AA; Li D; Ulrich T; Li B; Carena S; Verdecchia A; Gallovič F
Nature; 2023 Jun; 618(7964):308-315. PubMed ID: 37225989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-Term Foreshocks as Key Information for Mainshock Timing and Rupture: The M
Papadopoulos GA; Agalos A; Minadakis G; Triantafyllou I; Krassakis P
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(19):. PubMed ID: 33028009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 landers, california, earthquake.
Hill DP; Reasenberg PA; Michael A; Arabaz WJ; Beroza G; Brumbaugh D; Brune JN; Castro R; Davis S; Depolo D; Ellsworth WL; Gomberg J; Harmsen S; House L; Jackson SM; Johnston MJ; Jones L; Keller R; Malone S; Munguia L; Nava S; Pechmann JC; Sanford A; Simpson RW; Smith RB; Stark M; Stickney M; Vidal A; Walter S; Wong V; Zollweg J
Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5114):1617-23. PubMed ID: 17810202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Earthquakes as beacons of stress change.
Seeber L; Armbruster JG
Nature; 2000 Sep; 407(6800):69-72. PubMed ID: 10993073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The source parameters, surface deformation and tectonic setting of three recent earthquakes: thessalonki (Greece), tabas-e-golshan (iran) and carlisle (u.k.).
King G; Soufleris C; Berberian M
Disasters; 1981 Mar; 5(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 20958479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
