198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31624292)
1. Strategies to reduce genetic mosaicism following CRISPR-mediated genome edition in bovine embryos.
Lamas-Toranzo I; Galiano-Cogolludo B; Cornudella-Ardiaca F; Cobos-Figueroa J; Ousinde O; Bermejo-Álvarez P
Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):14900. PubMed ID: 31624292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Highly Efficient Mouse Genome Editing by CRISPR Ribonucleoprotein Electroporation of Zygotes.
Chen S; Lee B; Lee AY; Modzelewski AJ; He L
J Biol Chem; 2016 Jul; 291(28):14457-67. PubMed ID: 27151215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electroporation of AsCpf1/RNP at the Zygote Stage is an Efficient Genome Editing Method to Generate Knock-Out Mice Deficient in Leukemia Inhibitory Factor.
Kim YS; Kim GR; Park M; Yang SC; Park SH; Won JE; Lee JH; Shin HE; Song H; Kim HR
Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2020 Feb; 17(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 32002841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Generation of Nonmosaic, Two-Pore Channel 2 Biallelic Knockout Pigs in One Generation by CRISPR-Cas9 Microinjection Before Oocyte Insemination.
Navarro-Serna S; Hachem A; Canha-Gouveia A; Hanbashi A; Garrappa G; Lopes JS; París-Oller E; Sarrías-Gil L; Flores-Flores C; Bassett A; Sánchez R; Bermejo-Álvarez P; Matás C; Romar R; Parrington J; Gadea J
CRISPR J; 2021 Feb; 4(1):132-146. PubMed ID: 33616447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of mouse and human preimplantation development following POU5F1 CRISPR/Cas9 targeting reveals interspecies differences.
Stamatiadis P; Boel A; Cosemans G; Popovic M; Bekaert B; Guggilla R; Tang M; De Sutter P; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Menten B; Stoop D; Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM; Coucke P; Heindryckx B
Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1242-1252. PubMed ID: 33609360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electroporation of mice zygotes with dual guide RNA/Cas9 complexes for simple and efficient cloning-free genome editing.
Teixeira M; Py BF; Bosc C; Laubreton D; Moutin MJ; Marvel J; Flamant F; Markossian S
Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):474. PubMed ID: 29323173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of concentration of CRISPR/Cas9 components on genetic mosaicism in cytoplasmic microinjected porcine embryos.
Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; LE QA; Hirano T; Otoi T
J Reprod Dev; 2019 Jun; 65(3):209-214. PubMed ID: 30726783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysing the outcome of CRISPR-aided genome editing in embryos: Screening, genotyping and quality control.
Mianné J; Codner GF; Caulder A; Fell R; Hutchison M; King R; Stewart ME; Wells S; Teboul L
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():68-76. PubMed ID: 28363792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microinjection of Antisense Morpholinos, CRISPR/Cas9 RNP, and RNA/DNA into Zebrafish Embryos.
Xin Y; Duan C
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1742():205-211. PubMed ID: 29330802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Followed by CRIPSR/Cas9 Microinjection Results in Highly Efficient Genome Editing in Cloned Pigs.
Sheets TP; Park CH; Park KE; Powell A; Donovan DM; Telugu BP
Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Dec; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 27918485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CRISPR/Cas9 microinjection in oocytes disables pancreas development in sheep.
Vilarino M; Rashid ST; Suchy FP; McNabb BR; van der Meulen T; Fine EJ; Ahsan SD; Mursaliyev N; Sebastiano V; Diab SS; Huising MO; Nakauchi H; Ross PJ
Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17472. PubMed ID: 29234093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficient production of biallelic GGTA1 knockout pigs by cytoplasmic microinjection of CRISPR/Cas9 into zygotes.
Petersen B; Frenzel A; Lucas-Hahn A; Herrmann D; Hassel P; Klein S; Ziegler M; Hadeler KG; Niemann H
Xenotransplantation; 2016 Sep; 23(5):338-46. PubMed ID: 27610605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct Injection of CRISPR/Cas9-Related mRNA into Cytoplasm of Parthenogenetically Activated Porcine Oocytes Causes Frequent Mosaicism for Indel Mutations.
Sato M; Koriyama M; Watanabe S; Ohtsuka M; Sakurai T; Inada E; Saitoh I; Nakamura S; Miyoshi K
Int J Mol Sci; 2015 Aug; 16(8):17838-56. PubMed ID: 26247938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Timing of CRISPR/Cas9-related mRNA microinjection after activation as an important factor affecting genome editing efficiency in porcine oocytes.
Sato M; Kosuke M; Koriyama M; Inada E; Saitoh I; Ohtsuka M; Nakamura S; Sakurai T; Watanabe S; Miyoshi K
Theriogenology; 2018 Mar; 108():29-38. PubMed ID: 29195121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Generation of PDX-1 mutant porcine blastocysts by introducing CRISPR/Cas9-system into porcine zygotes via electroporation.
Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; Le QA; Hirano T; Takemoto T; Nakai M; Fuchimoto DI; Otoi T
Anim Sci J; 2019 Jan; 90(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 30368976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electroporation and genetic supply of Cas9 increase the generation efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in alleles in C57BL/6J mouse zygotes.
Alghadban S; Bouchareb A; Hinch R; Hernandez-Pliego P; Biggs D; Preece C; Davies B
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17912. PubMed ID: 33087834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targeted Transgenic Mice Using CRISPR /Cas9 Technology.
El Marjou F; Jouhanneau C; Krndija D
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2214():125-141. PubMed ID: 32944907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genome Editing in Mouse Zygotes and Embryonic Stem Cells by Introducing SgRNA/Cas9 Expressing Plasmids.
Noda T; Oji A; Ikawa M
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1630():67-80. PubMed ID: 28643250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Production of knockout mice by DNA microinjection of various CRISPR/Cas9 vectors into freeze-thawed fertilized oocytes.
Nakagawa Y; Sakuma T; Sakamoto T; Ohmuraya M; Nakagata N; Yamamoto T
BMC Biotechnol; 2015 May; 15():33. PubMed ID: 25997509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genome Editing in Mice Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology.
Hall B; Cho A; Limaye A; Cho K; Khillan J; Kulkarni AB
Curr Protoc Cell Biol; 2018 Dec; 81(1):e57. PubMed ID: 30178917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
