141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31624458)
1. Effectiveness of minimum retesting intervals in managing repetitive laboratory testing: experience from a Croatian university hospital.
Lapić I; Rogić D; Fuček M; Galović R
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2019 Oct; 29(3):030705. PubMed ID: 31624458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of a computerized alert system based on re-testing intervals for limiting the inappropriateness of laboratory test requests.
Lippi G; Brambilla M; Bonelli P; Aloe R; Balestrino A; Nardelli A; Ceda GP; Fabi M
Clin Biochem; 2015 Nov; 48(16-17):1174-6. PubMed ID: 26074445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The usefulness of implementing minimum retest intervals in reducing inappropriate laboratory test requests in a Dutch hospital.
Boerman AW; Al-Dulaimy M; Bandt YC; Nanayakkara PWB; de Jonge R
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Feb; 61(3):412-418. PubMed ID: 36525643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimum retesting intervals in practice: 10 years experience.
Lang T
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Sep; 59(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 32892171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An automated minimum retest interval rejection rule reduces repeat CRP workload and expenditure, and influences clinician-requesting behaviour.
Waldron JL; Ford C; Dobie D; Danks G; Humphrey R; Rolli A; Gama R
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):731-3. PubMed ID: 24898477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-year analysis of repeated laboratory tests for the markers total cholesterol, ferritin, vitamin D, vitamin B
Lanzoni M; Fornili M; Felicetta I; Maiavacca R; Biganzoli E; Castaldi S
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Jun; 23(3):654-661. PubMed ID: 28078809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 10 most frequently requested blood tests in the Capital Region of Denmark, 2010-2019 and simulated effect of minimal retesting intervals.
Munk JK; Hansen MF; Buhl H; Lind BS; Bathum L; Jørgensen HL
Clin Biochem; 2022 Feb; 100():55-59. PubMed ID: 34774816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Managing inappropriate requests of laboratory tests: from detection to monitoring.
Salinas M; López-Garrigós M; Flores E; Leiva-Salinas M; Asencio A; Lugo J; Leiva-Salinas C
Am J Manag Care; 2016 Sep; 22(9):e311-6. PubMed ID: 27662394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation and cost estimation of laboratory test overuse in 43 commonly ordered parameters through a Computerized Clinical Decision Support System (CCDSS) in a large university hospital.
Tamburrano A; Vallone D; Carrozza C; Urbani A; Sanguinetti M; Nicolotti N; Cambieri A; Laurenti P
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237159. PubMed ID: 32760101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cost of repetitive laboratory testing for chronic disease.
Ko SQ; Quah P; Lahiri M
Intern Med J; 2019 Sep; 49(9):1168-1170. PubMed ID: 31507043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Test Cancellation: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study.
Darcy TP; Barasch SP; Souers RJ; Perrotta PL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 26910216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appropriate use of laboratory test requests in the emergency department: a multilevel intervention.
Nazerian P; Vanni S; Fanelli A; Fallai L; Duranti C; Ognibene A; Rapi S; Betti L; Tomaiuolo M; Calamai M; Grifoni S
Eur J Emerg Med; 2019 Jun; 26(3):205-211. PubMed ID: 29176456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Request of laboratory liver tests in primary care in Spain: potential savings if appropriateness indicator targets were achieved.
Salinas M; López-Garrigós M; Flores E; Uris J; Leiva-Salinas C;
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Oct; 27(10):1130-6. PubMed ID: 26193053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Failure to review STAT clinical laboratory requests and its economical impact.
Rodriguez-Borja E; Villalba-Martinez C; Barba-Serrano E; Carratala-Calvo A
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2016; 26(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 26981019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating laboratory key performance using quality indicators in Alexandria University Hospital Clinical Chemistry Laboratories.
Rizk MM; Zaki A; Hossam N; Aboul-Ela Y
J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 2014 Dec; 89(3):105-13. PubMed ID: 25534174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pursuing appropriateness of laboratory tests: a 15-year experience in an academic medical institution.
Panteghini M; Dolci A; Birindelli S; Szoke D; Aloisio E; Caruso S
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2022 Oct; 60(11):1706-1718. PubMed ID: 35998662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Specimen rejection in laboratory medicine: Necessary for patient safety?
Dikmen ZG; Pinar A; Akbiyik F
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2015; 25(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 26527231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing duplicate testing: a comparison of two clinical decision support tools.
Procop GW; Keating C; Stagno P; Kottke-Marchant K; Partin M; Tuttle R; Wyllie R
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 May; 143(5):623-6. PubMed ID: 25873494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How compliant are technicians with universal safety measures in medical laboratories in Croatia?--A pilot study.
Dukic K; Zoric M; Pozaic P; Starcic J; Culjak M; Saracevic A; Miler M
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2015; 25(3):386-92. PubMed ID: 26526817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence and type of pre-analytical problems for inpatients samples in coagulation laboratory.
Salvagno GL; Lippi G; Bassi A; Poli G; Guidi GC
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Apr; 14(2):351-3. PubMed ID: 18324942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
