These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31624582)

  • 21. Host species and developmental stage, but not host social structure, affects bacterial community structure in socially polymorphic bees.
    McFrederick QS; Wcislo WT; Hout MC; Mueller UG
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2014 May; 88(2):398-406. PubMed ID: 24579829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wild Bee Pollen Usage and Microbial Communities Co-vary Across Landscapes.
    McFrederick QS; Rehan SM
    Microb Ecol; 2019 Feb; 77(2):513-522. PubMed ID: 30069710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rangeland sharing by cattle and bees: moderate grazing does not impair bee communities and resource availability.
    Shapira T; Henkin Z; Dag A; Mandelik Y
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Apr; 30(3):e02066. PubMed ID: 31872932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diversity and composition of pollen loads carried by pollinators are primarily driven by insect traits, not floral community characteristics.
    Cullen N; Xia J; Wei N; Kaczorowski R; Arceo-Gómez G; O'Neill E; Hayes R; Ashman TL
    Oecologia; 2021 May; 196(1):131-143. PubMed ID: 33839922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Female solitary bees flexibly change foraging behaviour according to their floral resource requirements and foraging experiences.
    Nagano Y; Wabiko N; Yokoi T
    Naturwissenschaften; 2023 Jul; 110(4):37. PubMed ID: 37466745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Survey of Soybean Insect Pollinators: Community Identification and Sampling Method Analysis.
    Gill KA; O'Neal ME
    Environ Entomol; 2015 Jun; 44(3):488-98. PubMed ID: 26313954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Non-target effects of agri-environmental schemes on solitary bees and fungi in the United Kingdom.
    Lunn K; Frøslev T; Rhodes M; Taylor L; Oliveira HFM; Gresty CEA; Clare EL
    Bull Entomol Res; 2022 Dec; 112(6):734-744. PubMed ID: 36082699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abundance and Diversity of Wild Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Found in Lowbush Blueberry Growing Regions of Downeast Maine.
    Bushmann SL; Drummond FA
    Environ Entomol; 2015 Aug; 44(4):975-89. PubMed ID: 26314043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Carpenter Bees (
    Holley JC; Jackson MN; Pham AT; Hatcher SC; Moran NA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2022 Jul; 88(13):e0020322. PubMed ID: 35758673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of agricultural landscape structure, insecticide residues, and pollen diversity on the life-history traits of the red mason bee Osmia bicornis.
    Bednarska AJ; Mikołajczyk Ł; Ziółkowska E; Kocjan K; Wnęk A; Mokkapati JS; Teper D; Kaczyński P; Łozowicka B; Śliwińska R; Laskowski R
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 809():151142. PubMed ID: 34688758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Native solitary bee reproductive success depends on early season precipitation and host plant richness.
    Westreich LR; Westreich ST; Tobin PC
    Oecologia; 2023 Apr; 201(4):965-978. PubMed ID: 36947272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bee pollinator functional responses and functional effects in restored tropical forests.
    Montoya-Pfeiffer PM; Rodrigues RR; Alves Dos Santos I
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Apr; 30(3):e02054. PubMed ID: 31828842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Capabilities and limitations of using DNA metabarcoding to study plant-pollinator interactions.
    Arstingstall KA; DeBano SJ; Li X; Wooster DE; Rowland MM; Burrows S; Frost K
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Oct; 30(20):5266-5297. PubMed ID: 34390062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Establishing realistic exposure estimates of solitary bee larvae via pollen for use in risk assessment.
    Pamminger T; Schneider C; Maas R; Bergtold M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2022 Mar; 18(2):308-313. PubMed ID: 34241949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When beggars are choosers-How nesting of a solitary bee is affected by temporal dynamics of pollen plants in the landscape.
    Persson AS; Mazier F; Smith HG
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Jun; 8(11):5777-5791. PubMed ID: 29938092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Foraging Economics of the Hunt Bumble Bee, a Viable Pollinator for Commercial Agriculture.
    Baur A; Strange JP; Koch JB
    Environ Entomol; 2019 Aug; 48(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 31175358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bee species visiting Medicago sativa differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow.
    Santa-Martinez E; Cardoso Castro C; Flick A; Sullivan M; Riday H; Clayton MK; Brunet J
    Am J Bot; 2021 Jun; 108(6):1016-1028. PubMed ID: 34114219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Limited phenological and dietary overlap between bee communities in spring flowering crops and herbaceous enhancements.
    Wood TJ; Gibbs J; Rothwell N; Wilson JK; Gut L; Brokaw J; Isaacs R
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Oct; 28(7):1924-1934. PubMed ID: 30184292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The abundance and pollen foraging behaviour of bumble bees in relation to population size of whortleberry (Vaccinium uliginosum).
    Mayer C; Michez D; Chyzy A; Brédat E; Jacquemart AL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50353. PubMed ID: 23209721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection.
    Arstingstall KA; DeBano SJ; Li X; Wooster DE; Rowland MM; Burrows S; Frost K
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0282715. PubMed ID: 37071613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.