These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31624918)

  • 1. The effect of performing versus preparing a task on the subsequent switch cost.
    Swainson R; Prosser L; Karavasilev K; Romanczuk A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):364-383. PubMed ID: 31624918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preparing a task is sufficient to generate a subsequent task-switch cost affecting task performance.
    Swainson R; Prosser LJ; Yamaguchi M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jan; 50(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 37498704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task-switch costs subsequent to cue-only trials.
    Swainson R; Martin D; Prosser L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1453-1470. PubMed ID: 27174655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 20037766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No-go trials can modulate switch cost by interfering with effects of task preparation.
    Lenartowicz A; Yeung N; Cohen JD
    Psychol Res; 2011 Jan; 75(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 20473686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs.
    Wylie GR; Murray MM; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 18476759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is task switching nothing but cue priming? Evidence from ERPs.
    Jost K; Mayr U; Rösler F
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 8(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 18405048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?
    Los SA; Van der Burg E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1895-915. PubMed ID: 20401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):405-15. PubMed ID: 21299334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new account of the effect of probability on task switching: ERP evidence following the manipulation of switch probability, cue informativeness and predictability.
    Nessler D; Friedman D; Johnson R
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Oct; 91(2):245-62. PubMed ID: 22820040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task practice differentially modulates task-switching performance across the adult lifespan.
    Whitson LR; Karayanidis F; Michie PT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):124-36. PubMed ID: 22000521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of cue format and cue transparency on task switching performance.
    Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1346-1369. PubMed ID: 30725390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intentional preparation of auditory attention-switches: Explicit cueing and sequential switch-predictability.
    Seibold JC; Nolden S; Oberem J; Fels J; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1382-1395. PubMed ID: 28631530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue-switch effects do not rely on the same neural systems as task-switch effects.
    De Baene W; Brass M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 21874602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task uncertainty can account for mixing and switch costs in task-switching.
    Cooper PS; Garrett PM; Rennie JL; Karayanidis F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131556. PubMed ID: 26107646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Covert judgements are sufficient to trigger subsequent task-switching costs.
    Swainson R; Martin D
    Psychol Res; 2013 Jul; 77(4):434-48. PubMed ID: 22886404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.