These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31625413)

  • 21. Assessment of the accuracy of an intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring device in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis (AIDT2H) study.
    Toyoda M; Murata T; Saito N; Kimura M; Takahashi H; Ishida N; Kitamura M; Hida M; Hayashi A; Moriguchi I; Kobayashi N; Tsuriya D; Sakao Y; Matsushita T; Ito Y; Suzuki S; Kasama S; Kasahara M; Yamakawa T; Mori K; Kuroda A; Miura J; Hirota Y; Abe M; Fukagawa M; Sakane N; Hosoda K
    Ther Apher Dial; 2021 Oct; 25(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 33403763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes who migrated from highlands to plains.
    Sun ZM; Du YZ; Wang SY; Sun SY; Ye Y; Sun XP; Li MX; He H; Long WC; Zhang CH; Yao XY; Fan WY; Wang L; Wu YH
    World J Diabetes; 2024 Jun; 15(6):1254-1262. PubMed ID: 38983810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitor in Individuals With Diabetes on Hemodialysis.
    Villard O; Breton MD; Rao S; Voelmle MK; Fuller MR; Myers HE; McFadden RK; Luke ZS; Wakeman CA; Clancy-Oliveri M; Basu A; Stumpf MM
    Diabetes Care; 2022 Jul; 45(7):1666-1669. PubMed ID: 35485908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of continuous glucose monitoring on low interstitial glucose values and low blood glucose values assessed by point-of-care blood glucose meters: results of a crossover trial.
    Hermanns N; Schumann B; Kulzer B; Haak T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 May; 8(3):516-22. PubMed ID: 24876615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost-utility analysis of a flash continuous glucose monitoring system in the management of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus on basal insulin therapy-An Italian healthcare system perspective.
    Del Prato S; Giorgino F; Szafranski K; Poon Y
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2024 Sep; 26(9):3633-3641. PubMed ID: 38853717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance of the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System during an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Exercise in Healthy Adolescents.
    Afeef S; Tolfrey K; Zakrzewski-Fruer JK; Barrett LA
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 37177452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Alarm characterization for a continuous glucose monitor that replaces traditional blood glucose monitoring.
    McGarraugh G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 4(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 20167167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Flash Glucose Monitoring to Assess Glycemic Control and Variability in Hemodialysis Patients: The GIOTTO Study.
    Mambelli E; Cristino S; Mosconi G; Göbl C; Tura A
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():617891. PubMed ID: 34395456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of technology on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized trials on continuous glucose monitoring and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
    Dicembrini I; Mannucci E; Monami M; Pala L
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2019 Dec; 21(12):2619-2625. PubMed ID: 31368658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Three-Way Accuracy Comparison of the Dexcom G5, Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro, and Senseonics Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in a Home-Use Study of Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Jafri RZ; Balliro CA; El-Khatib F; Maheno MM; Hillard MA; O'Donovan A; Selagamsetty R; Zheng H; Damiano ER; Russell SJ
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Nov; 22(11):846-852. PubMed ID: 32453604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and clinical applicability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Is CGM ready for real time?
    Mazze RS; Strock E; Borgman S; Wesley D; Stout P; Racchini J
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Jan; 11(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 19132850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the FreeStyle Libre Pro Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System and Point-of-Care Capillary Glucose Testing in Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen.
    Galindo RJ; Migdal AL; Davis GM; Urrutia MA; Albury B; Zambrano C; Vellanki P; Pasquel FJ; Fayfman M; Peng L; Umpierrez GE
    Diabetes Care; 2020 Nov; 43(11):2730-2735. PubMed ID: 32641372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Design, development, and evaluation of a novel microneedle array-based continuous glucose monitor.
    Jina A; Tierney MJ; Tamada JA; McGill S; Desai S; Chua B; Chang A; Christiansen M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 May; 8(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 24876610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of three different continuous glucose monitoring systems in children with type 1 diabetes during a diabetes summer camp.
    Nagl K; Berger G; Aberer F; Ziko H; Weimann K; Bozic I; Rami-Merhar B; Mader JK
    Pediatr Diabetes; 2021 Mar; 22(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 33219728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A head-to-head comparison of personal and professional continuous glucose monitoring systems in people with type 1 diabetes: Hypoglycaemia remains the weak spot.
    Moser O; Pandis M; Aberer F; Kojzar H; Hochfellner D; Elsayed H; Motschnig M; Augustin T; Kreuzer P; Pieber TR; Sourij H; Mader JK
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2019 Apr; 21(4):1043-1048. PubMed ID: 30484947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance and Usability of Three Systems for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Direct Comparison.
    Freckmann G; Link M; Kamecke U; Haug C; Baumgartner B; Weitgasser R
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Sep; 13(5):890-898. PubMed ID: 30730229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring.
    Kovatchev BP; Patek SD; Ortiz EA; Breton MD
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 25436913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SELF BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING UNDERESTIMATES HYPERGLYCEMIA AND HYPOGLYCEMIA AS COMPARED TO CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING IN TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 DIABETES.
    Mangrola D; Cox C; Furman AS; Krishnan S; Karakas SE
    Endocr Pract; 2018 Jan; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 29144814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Differences Between Flash Glucose Monitor and Fingerprick Measurements.
    Staal OM; Hansen HMU; Christiansen SC; Fougner AL; Carlsen SM; Stavdahl Ø
    Biosensors (Basel); 2018 Oct; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 30336581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy and Time Delay of Glucose Measurements of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Bedside Artificial Pancreas During Hyperglycemic and Euglycemic Hyperinsulinemic Glucose Clamp Study.
    Kuroda A; Taniguchi S; Akehi Y; Mori H; Tamaki M; Suzuki R; Otsuka Y; Matsuhisa M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1096-1100. PubMed ID: 28992720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.