These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3162600)

  • 1. Effect of image enhancement for detectability of bone lesions in digitized intraoral radiographs.
    Wenzel A
    Scand J Dent Res; 1988 Apr; 96(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 3162600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of varying gray-scale resolution for detectability of bone lesions in intraoral radiographs digitized for teletransmission.
    Wenzel A
    Scand J Dent Res; 1987 Dec; 95(6):483-92. PubMed ID: 3480566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri-implant tissue changes.
    Fourmousis I; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Tonetti M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Jun; 5(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 7918909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphodigital evaluation of the trabecular bone pattern in the mandible using digitized panoramic and periapical radiographs.
    Aranha Watanabe PC; Moreira Lopes De Faria L; Mardegan Issa JP; Caldeira Monteiro SA; Tiossi R
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):73-80. PubMed ID: 19357613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital image processing. I. Evaluation of gray level correction methods in vitro.
    Fourmousis I; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Tonetti M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 8038343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of hard tissue density changes around implants assessed in digitized conventional radiographs and subtraction images.
    Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; Bóscolo FN; Haiter-Neto F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 16958697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The evaluation of the marginal bone height on traditional and digitized panoramic radiographs].
    Larsen TS; Regli PE
    Tandlaegebladet; 1989 Jan; 93(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 2623591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. IT-based evaluation and automatic improvement of the quality of intraoral radiographs.
    Koch S; Wagner IV; Seipel S; Schneider W
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1995 Jan; 46(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 7743780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of image variations on fractal dimension calculations.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Hildebolt CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jul; 84(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 9247959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of soft tissues on mandibular gray scale levels.
    Souza PH; da Costa NP; Veeck EB
    Braz Oral Res; 2004; 18(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 15273785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
    J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of computer-generated, enhanced and conventional 2-dimensional radiographic imaging.
    Hazey MA; Ngan P; Reed H; Razmus T; Crout R; Kao E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 19361732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture interpretation using electronic presentation: a comparison.
    Bancroft LW; Berquist TH; Morin RL; Pietan JH; Knudsen JM; Williams HJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Feb; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 10696596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) of bone density in periradicular bone defects healing.
    Katanec D; Kobler P; Slaj M; Anić I; Milosak T
    Coll Antropol; 1998 Dec; 22 Suppl():7-13. PubMed ID: 9951134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of photodensitometric with high-resolution digital analysis of bone density from serial dental radiographs.
    Dubrez B; Jacot-Descombes A; Pun T; Cimasoni G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 1397451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic features of periodontal bone defects: evaluation of digitized images.
    Gomes-Filho IS; Sarmento VA; de Castro MS; da Costa NP; da Cruz SS; Trindade SC; de Freitas CO; de Santana Passos J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 17586851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital radiographic image-based bone level measurements: effect of film density.
    Shrout MK; Powell BJ; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Ahmed NM
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Sep; 20(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 8408722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.