185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31626098)
1. Efficacy of computed tomography in prediction of operability of L5/S1 foraminal stenosis using region of interest: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.
Shim DW; Lee BH; Seo J; Hong H; Shin SC; Kim HS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(42):e17422. PubMed ID: 31626098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Roentgenographic and computed tomographic findings in symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Yamada K; Aota Y; Higashi T; Ishida K; Niimura T; Konno T; Saito T
Eur Spine J; 2015 Feb; 24(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 25412835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New methods for diagnosing lumbar foraminal stenosis using dynamic digital tomosynthesis radiculography.
Mataki K; Koda M; Shibao Y; Kumagai H; Nagashima K; Miura K; Noguchi H; Funayama T; Abe T; Yamazaki M
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 77():106-109. PubMed ID: 32387257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Radiological characteristics and clinical manifestation of isolated lumbar foraminal stenosis].
Chen X; Feng S; Guan H; Yu Z; Cui L; Wang Y; Xu S; Yuan X
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Aug; 53(8):584-8. PubMed ID: 26653957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel diagnostic parameter, foraminal stenotic ratio using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging, as a discriminator for surgery in symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Yamada K; Abe Y; Satoh S; Yanagibashi Y; Hyakumachi T; Masuda T
Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1074-1081. PubMed ID: 28366688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar foraminal stenosis: preoperative diagnosis and surgical strategy.
Watanabe K; Yamazaki A; Morita O; Sano A; Katsumi K; Ohashi M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 May; 24(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 20634730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stenosis of lumbar intervertebral foramen: anatomic study on predisposing factors.
Cinotti G; De Santis P; Nofroni I; Postacchini F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Feb; 27(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 11805682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Lee S; Lee JW; Yeom JS; Kim KJ; Kim HJ; Chung SK; Kang HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):1095-8. PubMed ID: 20308517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lumbar foraminal stenosis, the hidden stenosis including at L5/S1.
Orita S; Inage K; Eguchi Y; Kubota G; Aoki Y; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Koda M; Ohtori S
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):685-93. PubMed ID: 27318669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A case of symptomatic extra-foraminal lumbosacral stenosis ("far-out syndrome") diagnosed by diffusion tensor imaging.
Kitamura M; Eguchi Y; Inoue G; Orita S; Takaso M; Ochiai N; Kishida S; Kuniyoshi K; Aoki Y; Nakamura J; Ishikawa T; Arai G; Miyagi M; Kamoda H; Suzuki M; Furuya T; Toyone T; Takahashi K; Ohtori S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(14):E854-7. PubMed ID: 22246537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of L7-S1 nerve root pathology with low-field MRI in dogs with lumbosacral foraminal stenosis.
Lichtenhahn V; Richter H; Gödde T; Kircher P
Vet Surg; 2020 Jul; 49(5):947-957. PubMed ID: 32342548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morphologic Changes in Contralateral Lumbar Foramen in Unilateral Cantilever Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Kidney-type Intervertebral Spacers.
Iwata T; Miyamoto K; Hioki A; Fushimi K; Ohno T; Shimizu K
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Jun; 28(5):E270-6. PubMed ID: 23381185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microsurgical posterolateral transmuscular approach for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Chang HS; Zidan I; Fujisawa N; Matsui T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 20975597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does "Coronal Root Angle" Serve as a Parameter in the Removal of Ventral Factors for Foraminal Stenosis at L5-S1 In Stand-alone Microendoscopic Decompression?
Merter A; Shibayama M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Dec; 45(23):1676-1684. PubMed ID: 32858742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrophysiological diagnosis using sensory nerve action potential for the intraforaminal and extraforaminal L5 nerve root entrapment.
Ando M; Tamaki T; Kawakami M; Minamide A; Nakagawa Y; Maio K; Enyo Y; Yoshida M
Eur Spine J; 2013 Apr; 22(4):833-9. PubMed ID: 23179988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New diagnostic support tool for lumbosacral foraminal stenosis using radiographs of the lumbar spine.
Okada S; Oka H; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Yamada H
J Clin Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 96():8-11. PubMed ID: 34953440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of body position, imaging plane, and observer on computed tomographic measurements of the lumbosacral intervertebral foraminal area in dogs.
Higgins BM; Cripps PJ; Baker M; Moore L; Penrose FE; McConnell JF
Am J Vet Res; 2011 Jul; 72(7):905-17. PubMed ID: 21728851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():457-61. PubMed ID: 15457776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In the quest for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis etiology: the Schmorl's nodes model.
Abbas J; Slon V; Stein D; Peled N; Hershkovitz I; Hamoud K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Apr; 18(1):164. PubMed ID: 28424050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Haleem-Botchu classification: a novel CT-based classification for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Haleem S; Malik M; Guduri V; Azzopardi C; James S; Botchu R
Eur Spine J; 2021 Apr; 30(4):865-869. PubMed ID: 33179129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
