370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31628540)
1. Stress analysis of the implants in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under static and vibration loadings: a comparison between pedicle screw fixation system with rigid and flexible rods.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Oct; 30(10):118. PubMed ID: 31628540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the influence of three different lumbar interbody fusion approaches on stress in the pedicle screw fixation system: Finite element static and vibration analyses.
Fan W; Guo LX
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 Mar; 35(3):e3162. PubMed ID: 30294902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhang M
Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2342-2350. PubMed ID: 33948750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine.
Fan W; Guo LX
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):490-498. PubMed ID: 30714396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite Element Analysis of a New Pedicle Screw-Plate System for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Li J; Shang J; Zhou Y; Li C; Liu H
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144637. PubMed ID: 26649749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical Evaluation of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Coflex-F and Pedicle Screw Fixation: Finite Element Analysis of Static and Vibration Conditions.
Zhu J; Shen H; Cui Y; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Liu W
Orthop Surg; 2022 Sep; 14(9):2339-2349. PubMed ID: 35946442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress analysis in a pedicle screw fixation system with flexible rods in the lumbar spine.
Kim K; Park WM; Kim YH; Lee S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(3):477-85. PubMed ID: 20408492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Role of Posterior Screw Fixation in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion During Whole Body Vibration: A Finite Element Study.
Fan W; Guo LX
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e1086-e1093. PubMed ID: 29605701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e81-e88. PubMed ID: 33647495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical analysis of single-level interbody fusion with different internal fixation rod materials: a finite element analysis.
Hsieh YY; Tsuang FY; Kuo YJ; Chen CH; Chiang CJ; Lin CL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):100. PubMed ID: 32059656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hybrid pedicle screw and modified cortical bone trajectory technique in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5 segment: finite element analysis.
Kahaer A; Zhang R; Wang Y; Luan H; Maimaiti A; Liu D; Shi W; Zhang T; Guo H; Rexiti P
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):288. PubMed ID: 37055739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The anterior and traverse cage can provide optimal biomechanical performance for both traditional and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
He L; Xiang Q; Yang Y; Tsai TY; Yu Y; Cheng L
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Apr; 131():104291. PubMed ID: 33676337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws.
Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion after decompressive surgery--a finite element analysis.
Chen SH; Lin SC; Tsai WC; Wang CW; Chao SH
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 May; 13():72. PubMed ID: 22591664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with various fixation options: Finite element analysis of static and vibration conditions.
Shen H; Chen Y; Liao Z; Liu W
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Apr; 84():105339. PubMed ID: 33780788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite Element Modeling for Biomechanical Comparisons of Multilevel Transforaminal, Posterior, and Lateral Lumbar Approaches to Interbody Fusion Augmented with Posterior Instrumentation.
Shimooki Y; Murakami H; Nishida N; Yan H; Oikawa R; Hirooki E; Yamabe D; Chiba Y; Sakai T; Doita M
World Neurosurg; 2024 Feb; 182():e463-e470. PubMed ID: 38042291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of rigid, semi-rigid and flexible spinal stabilization devices: A finite element study.
Biswas JK; Roy S; Rana M; Halder S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Dec; 233(12):1292-1298. PubMed ID: 31608769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
