297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31628839)
1. Consumer preferences for beef with improved nutrient profile1.
Flowers S; McFadden BR; Carr CC; Mateescu RG
J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4699-4709. PubMed ID: 31628839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of marbling and shear force on consumers' willingness to pay for beef strip loin steaks.
Platter WJ; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Koontz SR; Chapman PL; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2005 Apr; 83(4):890-9. PubMed ID: 15753345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness.
Miller MF; Carr MA; Ramsey CB; Crockett KL; Hoover LC
J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3062-8. PubMed ID: 11811460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of taste in willingness-to-pay valuations of sirloin steaks from postextraction algal residue-fed cattle.
Johnson MD; Miller RK; Morrill JC; Anderson DP; Wickersham TA; Sawyer JE; Richardson JW; Palma MA
J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):3072-83. PubMed ID: 27482694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of hedonic evaluation on consumers' preferences for beef attributes including its enrichment with n-3 and CLA fatty acids.
Baba Y; Kallas Z; Costa-Font M; Gil JM; Realini CE
Meat Sci; 2016 Jan; 111():9-17. PubMed ID: 26331961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Nutritional analysis of eight kinds of prefabricated beef steaks].
Wang X; Yu X; Hu Y; Jiang J; Liu B; Shan X; Li W
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2020 Nov; 49(6):969-977. PubMed ID: 33413774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay.
Bonny SPF; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Allen P; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 28190414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying consumer preferences for specific beef flavor characteristics in relation to cattle production and postmortem processing parameters.
O'Quinn TG; Woerner DR; Engle TE; Chapman PL; Legako JF; Brooks JC; Belk KE; Tatum JD
Meat Sci; 2016 Feb; 112():90-102. PubMed ID: 26560806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic correlation estimates between beef fatty acid profile with meat and carcass traits in Nellore cattle finished in feedlot.
Feitosa FL; Olivieri BF; Aboujaoude C; Pereira AS; de Lemos MV; Chiaia HL; Berton MP; Peripolli E; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Mazalli MR; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Tonhati H; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; de Oliveira Silva RM; Gordo DG; Magalhães AF; Aguilar I; Baldi F
J Appl Genet; 2017 Feb; 58(1):123-132. PubMed ID: 27475083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consumer sensory evaluation and chemical composition of beef gluteus medius and triceps brachii steaks from cattle finished on forage or concentrate diets.
Chail A; Legako JF; Pitcher LR; Ward RE; Martini S; MacAdam JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1553-1564. PubMed ID: 28464115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic beef steaks and steaks from a branded, Argentine beef program.
Killinger KM; Calkins CR; Umberger WJ; Feuz DM; Eskridge KM
J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3302-7. PubMed ID: 15542477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding the role of information and taste heterogeneity in consumer preferences for functional beef: The case of the omega-3 enriched burger.
Boncinelli F; Piracci G; Casini L
Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108614. PubMed ID: 34229235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total, Fresh, Lean, and Fresh Lean Beef Consumption in Relation to Nutrient Intakes and Diet Quality among U.S. Adults, 2005⁻2016.
An R; Nickols-Richardson S; Alston R; Shen S; Clarke C
Nutrients; 2019 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 30845714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Muscle profiling to improve the value of retail meat cuts.
Jung EY; Hwang YH; Joo ST
Meat Sci; 2016 Oct; 120():47-53. PubMed ID: 27134030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products.
Ardeshiri A; Sampson S; Swait J
Meat Sci; 2019 Nov; 157():107868. PubMed ID: 31234027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consumer impressions of Tender Select beef.
Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Meade MK; Reagan JO; Byrnes BL; Koohmaraie M
J Anim Sci; 2001 Oct; 79(10):2605-14. PubMed ID: 11721839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consumer visual preference and value for beef steaks differing in marbling level and color.
Killinger KM; Calkins CR; Umberger WJ; Feuz DM; Eskridge KM
J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3288-93. PubMed ID: 15542475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health information impact on the relative importance of beef attributes including its enrichment with polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3 and conjugated linoleic acid).
Kallas Z; Realini CE; Gil JM
Meat Sci; 2014 Aug; 97(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 24769150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?
Strydom P; Burrow H; Polkinghorne R; Thompson J
Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():122-130. PubMed ID: 30677552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Beef choice.
Ngapo TM; Braña Varela D; Rubio Lozano MS
Meat Sci; 2017 Dec; 134():34-43. PubMed ID: 28750333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
