52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31628851)
21. Value of magnetic resonance and ¹⁸FDG PET-CT in predicting tumor response and resectability of primary locally advanced cervical cancer after treatment with intensity-modulated arc therapy: a prospective pathology-matched study.
Vandecasteele K; Delrue L; Lambert B; Makar A; Lambein K; Denys H; Tummers P; Van den Broecke R; Villeirs G; De Meerleer G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 May; 22(4):630-7. PubMed ID: 22237382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patterns of failure after use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in integration of extended-field chemo-IMRT and 3D-brachytherapy plannings for advanced cervical cancers with extensive lymph node metastases.
Chung YL; Horng CF; Lee PI; Chen FL
BMC Cancer; 2016 Mar; 16():179. PubMed ID: 26940959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Value of [
Li K; Sun H; Lu Z; Xin J; Zhang L; Guo Y; Guo Q
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():160-166. PubMed ID: 30150039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The added benefit of transvaginal sonography in the clinical staging of cervical carcinoma.
Goldberg Y; Siegler Y; Segev Y; Mandel R; Siegler E; Auslander R; Lavie O
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Mar; 99(3):312-316. PubMed ID: 31628851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
Fischerová D; Cibula D
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?
Haldorsen IS; Lura N; Blaakær J; Fischerova D; Werner HMJ
Curr Oncol Rep; 2019 Jul; 21(9):77. PubMed ID: 31359169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Imaging in cervical cancer.
Follen M; Levenback CF; Iyer RB; Grigsby PW; Boss EA; Delpassand ES; Fornage BD; Fishman EK
Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9 Suppl):2028-38. PubMed ID: 14603539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in the screening of cervical cancer: a literature review.
Guo F; Yang R; Tian J; Fan L
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2014 Jun; 69(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 24272282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
Liu B; Gao S; Li S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Limited additional value of cervical ultrasonography over a negative 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Goense L; Meziani J; van Rossum PSN; Wessels FJ; Meijer GJ; Lam MGEH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jul; 39(7):645-651. PubMed ID: 29672463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Imaging and Staging of Cervical Cancer.
Devine C; Viswanathan C; Faria S; Marcal L; Sagebiel TL
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2019 Aug; 40(4):280-286. PubMed ID: 31375168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging.
Salib MY; Russell JHB; Stewart VR; Sudderuddin SA; Barwick TD; Rockall AG; Bharwani N
Radiographics; 2020 Oct; 40(6):1807-1822. PubMed ID: 32946322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer.
Kido A; Nakamoto Y
Br J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 94(1125):20201342. PubMed ID: 33989030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Current imaging strategies for the evaluation of uterine cervical cancer.
Bourgioti C; Chatoupis K; Moulopoulos LA
World J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 8(4):342-54. PubMed ID: 27158421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Functional imaging to predict tumor response in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Barwick TD; Taylor A; Rockall A
Curr Oncol Rep; 2013 Dec; 15(6):549-58. PubMed ID: 24114187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Role of Imaging in Cervical Cancer Staging: ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines (Update 2023).
Fischerova D; Frühauf F; Burgetova A; Haldorsen IS; Gatti E; Cibula D
Cancers (Basel); 2024 Feb; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 38398166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for local staging of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tian Y; Luo H
Med Ultrason; 2022 Aug; 24(3):348-355. PubMed ID: 34762728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
