251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31628885)
1. Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography.
Massaro C; Losada C; Cevidanes L; Yatabe M; Garib D; Lauris JRP; Ioshida M; Rey D; Alvarez MA; Benavides E; Rios H; Aristizabal JF; Ruellas AC
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):118-128. PubMed ID: 31628885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dental long axes using digital dental models compared to cone-beam computed tomography.
Cong A; Massaro C; Ruellas ACO; Barkley M; Yatabe M; Bianchi J; Ioshida M; Alvarez MA; Aristizabal JF; Rey D; Cevidanes L
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 33966340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of miniscrews as references in cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scanner digital models: study on goat heads.
Jiang Y; Chen G
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):259. PubMed ID: 31771579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new method assessing predicted and achieved mandibular tooth movement in adults treated with clear aligners using CBCT and individual crown superimposition.
Alwafi AA; Hannam AG; Yen EH; Zou B
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4084. PubMed ID: 36906671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability, reproducibility and validity of the conventional buccolingual and mesiodistal measurements on 3D dental digital models obtained from intra-oral 3D scanner.
Soto-Álvarez C; Fonseca GM; Viciano J; Alemán I; Rojas-Torres J; Zúñiga MH; López-Lázaro S
Arch Oral Biol; 2020 Jan; 109():104575. PubMed ID: 31589998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation of teeth by conventional panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images - A cross-sectional study.
Barakaat AA; Maaz M; Sukhia RH; Fida M
Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100757. PubMed ID: 37163932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images.
Tong H; Enciso R; Van Elslande D; Major PW; Sameshima GT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 22748999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Construction reproducibility of a composite tooth model composed of an intraoral-scanned crown and a cone-beam computed tomography-scanned root.
Lim SW; Moon RJ; Kim MS; Oh MH; Lee KM; Hwang HS; Kim TW; Baek SH; Cho JH
Korean J Orthod; 2020 Jul; 50(4):229-237. PubMed ID: 32632042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cone-beam computed tomography analysis of angulation and inclination of whole tooth and clinical crown in adults with normal occlusion.
Wang H; Zhao N; Li P; Shen G
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 Nov; 22(4):337-344. PubMed ID: 31232504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement error and reliability of three available 3D superimposition methods in growing patients.
Ponce-Garcia C; Ruellas ACO; Cevidanes LHS; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Lagravere-Vich M
Head Face Med; 2020 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 31987041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of integration of dental cast and cephalograms compared with cone-beam computed tomography: a comparative study.
Dai F; Chen S; Feng T; Lu W; Chen G; Jiang J; Jiang R; Lin J; Han B; Xu T
Odontology; 2023 Jan; 111(1):238-247. PubMed ID: 35945305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.
Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and reliability of mandibular digital model registration with use of the mucogingival junction as the reference.
Ioshida M; Muñoz BA; Rios H; Cevidanes L; Aristizabal JF; Rey D; Kim-Berman H; Yatabe M; Benavides E; Alvarez MA; Volk S; Ruellas AC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):351-360. PubMed ID: 30472195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear Measurements Made on CBCT-derived Digital Models.
Maroua AL; Ajaj M; Hajeer MY
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 27340163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
