251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31628885)
21. Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.
Baldini B; Cavagnetto D; Baselli G; Sforza C; Tartaglia GM
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35351080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy and reliability of the expected root position setup methodology to evaluate root position during orthodontic treatment.
Lee RJ; Pi S; Park J; Devgon D; Nelson G; Hatcher D; Oberoi S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):583-595. PubMed ID: 30268268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim J; Heo G; Lagravère MO
Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23957664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Malocclusion Class II division 1 skeletal and dental relationships measured by cone-beam computed tomography.
Xu Y; Oh H; Lagravère MO
Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):365-387. PubMed ID: 28818647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automated artificial intelligence-based three-dimensional comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes with and without piezocision surgery.
Gurgel M; Alvarez MA; Aristizabal JF; Baquero B; Gillot M; Al Turkestani N; Miranda F; Castillo AA; Bianchi J; de Oliveira Ruellas AC; Ioshida M; Yatabe M; Rey D; Prieto J; Cevidanes L
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Apr; 27(2):321-331. PubMed ID: 38009409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Fabrication and accuracy research on 3D printing dental model based on cone beam computed tomography digital modeling].
Zhang HR; Yin LF; Liu YL; Yan LY; Wang N; Liu G; An XL; Liu B
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 36(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 29779276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of deep learning-based integrated tooth models by merging intraoral scans and CBCT scans for 3D evaluation of root position during orthodontic treatment.
Lee SC; Hwang HS; Lee KC
Prog Orthod; 2022 May; 23(1):15. PubMed ID: 35527317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of three-dimensional periodontal ligament models generated using cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions for the assessment of periodontal bone loss.
Lyu H; Xu L; Ma H; Hou J; Wang X; Wang Y; Zhao Y; Li W; Li X
Korean J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 53(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 36960719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of a surface-based fusion method when integrating digital models and the cone beam computed tomography scans with metal artifacts.
Zou B; Kim JH; Kim SH; Choi TH; Shin Y; Kook YA; Lee NK
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8034. PubMed ID: 35577911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A new age estimation procedure based on the 3D CBCT study of the pulp cavity and hard tissues of the teeth for forensic purposes: A pilot study.
Pinchi V; Pradella F; Buti J; Baldinotti C; Focardi M; Norelli GA
J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Nov; 36():150-7. PubMed ID: 26458182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of in vivo 3D cone-beam computed tomography tooth volume measurement protocols.
Forst D; Nijjar S; Flores-Mir C; Carey J; Secanell M; Lagravere M
Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):69. PubMed ID: 25534123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validation of a windowing protocol for accurate in vivo tooth segmentation using i-CAT cone beam computed tomography.
Rastegar B; Thumilaire B; Odri GA; Siciliano S; Zapała J; Mahy P; Olszewski R
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 29999253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of the dental follicle volume of palatally impacted canines on the relative position of the adjacent teeth.
Lam M; Dekel E; Nucci L; Grassia V; Naoumova J; Pacheco-Pereira C; Perillo L; Chaushu S; Flores-Mir C
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 38001047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Precision of three-dimensional printed brackets].
Zhang D; Wang LC; Zhou YH; Liu XM; Li J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Aug; 49(4):704-708. PubMed ID: 28816292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Anthropometric Comparison of 3-Dimensional Facial Scan Taken With a Low-Cost Facial Scanner With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scan.
Aljawad H; Lim HJ; Lee KC
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 34(5):1456-1458. PubMed ID: 36731044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index.
Kau CH; Littlefield J; Rainy N; Nguyen JT; Creed B
Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 20050733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Digital model superimpositions: are different software algorithms equally accurate in quantifying linear tooth movements?
Adel SM; Vaid NR; El-Harouni N; Kassem H; Zaher AR
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):103. PubMed ID: 35361187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
