251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31628885)
41. Accuracy of a Method to Monitor Root Position Using a 3D Digital Crown/Root Model during Orthodontic Treatments.
Ogawa K; Ishida Y; Kuwajima Y; Lee C; Emge JR; Izumisawa M; Satoh K; Ishikawa-Nagai S; Da Silva JD; Chen CY
Tomography; 2022 Feb; 8(2):550-559. PubMed ID: 35314622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Mesiodistal tooth dimensions and anterior and overall Bolton ratios evaluated by cone beam computed tomography.
Celikoglu M; Nur M; Kilkis D; Sezgin OS; Bayram M
Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 24380134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Variation in mesiodistal root angulation of panoramic images generated from cone-beam computed tomography.
Liu SQ; Wen FJ; Chen H; Liu Y
Chin J Dent Res; 2013; 16(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 24436945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Three-dimensional skeletal and dental patterns obtained from cone-beam computer tomography of patients diagnosed as malocclusion class I.
Lee H; Oh HS; Lagravère MO
Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 31010730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. 3D reconstruction of lower anterior teeth from CBCT images: automatic segmentation with manual refinements.
Morell GFC; Chen K; Flores-Mir C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 28(3):e232249. PubMed ID: 37466507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation between panoramic radiography and reconstructed panoramic images from cone beam computed tomography].
Liu S; Wen F; Chen H; Liu Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 49(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24697881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. An Evaluation of Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography- and Two Dimensional-based Interpretations of Maxillary Canine Impactions using a Panel of Orthodontically Trained Observers.
Al-Homsi HK; Hajeer MY
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Aug; 16(8):648-56. PubMed ID: 26423501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Three-dimensional prediction of roots position through cone-beam computed tomography scans-digital model superimposition: A novel method.
Staderini E; Guglielmi F; Cornelis MA; Cattaneo PM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 Feb; 22(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 30449070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Accuracy of three-dimensional printed models derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Ferraro JM; Falter J; Lee S; Watanabe K; Wu TH; Kim DG; Ko CC; Tanaka E; Deguchi T
Angle Orthod; 2022 Nov; 92(6):722-727. PubMed ID: 35852459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cone Beam Computed Tomography-based Evaluation of the Anterior Teeth Position Changes obtained by Passive Self-ligating Brackets.
Rhoden FK; Maltagliati LÁ; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Filho LC; de Almeida Cardoso M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):623-9. PubMed ID: 27659077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Quantification of external root resorption by low- vs high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography: A volumetric and linear analysis.
Ponder SN; Benavides E; Kapila S; Hatch NE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23273363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Can we estimate root axis using a 3-dimensional tooth model via lingual-surface intraoral scanning?
Lim SW; Park H; Lim SY; Choo HH; Baek SH; Hwang HS; Cho JH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Nov; 158(5):e99-e109. PubMed ID: 33131571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Dental measurements based on a three-dimensional digital technique: A comparative study on reliability and validity.
Liu J; Liu Y; Wang J; Zuo X; Wang X; Zhang Y; He H
Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Apr; 124():105059. PubMed ID: 33508626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reliability of CBCT in the diagnosis of dental asymmetry.
Ruellas AC; Koerich L; Baratieri C; Mattos CT; Alves M; Brunetto D; Eidson L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 24945519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth in 3-dimensional space in patients with near-normal occlusion.
Tong H; Kwon D; Shi J; Sakai N; Enciso R; Sameshima GT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):604-17. PubMed ID: 22554755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Assessment of the accuracy of laser-scanned models and 3-dimensional rendered cone-beam computed tomographic images compared to digital caliper measurements on plaster casts.
Yousefi F; Shokri A; Zahedi F; Farhadian M
Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Dec; 51(4):429-438. PubMed ID: 34988004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. In vivo accuracy of tooth surface reconstruction based on CBCT and dental MRI-A clinical pilot study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Weber D; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):920-927. PubMed ID: 31257638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Dental and skeletal changes in the upper and lower jaws after treatment with Schwarz appliances using cone-beam computed tomography.
Tai K; Park JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 21189775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
