251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31628885)
61. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.
Almeida MR; Futagami C; Conti AC; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):50-7. PubMed ID: 26154456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Radiographical measurements for distal intra-articular fractures of the radius using plain radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images.
Suojärvi N; Sillat T; Lindfors N; Koskinen SK
Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Dec; 44(12):1769-75. PubMed ID: 26272335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Software in Predicting the Size of Impacted Canine: A Preliminary Study.
Dhanasekaran M; Faizee SH; Rengarajan KN
Turk J Orthod; 2023 Jun; 36(2):111-117. PubMed ID: 37346063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Three-dimensional volumetric evaluation of dental pulp cavity/tooth ratio in anterior open bite malocclusion using cone beam computed tomography.
Kuharattanachai K; Jotikasthira D; Sirabanchongkran S; Srisuwan T; Rangsri W; Tripuwabhrut K
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1997-2004. PubMed ID: 34510253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Accuracy of mesiodistal root angulation projected by cone-beam computed tomographic panoramic-like images.
Van Elslande D; Heo G; Flores-Mir C; Carey J; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S94-9. PubMed ID: 20381767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. A Digital Approach to Evaluating Tooth Root Position Without Repeated Cone-beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Lee KC
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 33(4):e347-e349. PubMed ID: 34347718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.
Moreira CR; Sales MA; Lopes PM; Cavalcanti MG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 19386521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans.
Al-Rawi B; Hassan B; Vandenberge B; Jacobs R
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 20180895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned digital models compared with plaster models (gold standard) and cone-beam computer tomography images.
Kim J; Lagravére MO
Korean J Orthod; 2016 Jan; 46(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 26877978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Preliminary study: evaluating the reliability of CBCT images for tongue space measurements in the field of orthodontics.
Halim IA; Park JH; Liou EJW; Zeinalddin M; Al Samawi YS; Bay RC
Oral Radiol; 2021 Apr; 37(2):256-266. PubMed ID: 32418067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Correlation between Dental Vestibular-Palatal Inclination and Alveolar Bone Remodeling after Orthodontic Treatment: A CBCT Analysis.
Maspero C; Gaffuri F; Castro IO; Lanteri V; Ugolini A; Farronato M
Materials (Basel); 2019 Dec; 12(24):. PubMed ID: 31888251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. A novel method to estimate the volume of bone defects using cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
Esposito SA; Huybrechts B; Slagmolen P; Cotti E; Coucke W; Pauwels R; Lambrechts P; Jacobs R
J Endod; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1111-5. PubMed ID: 23953281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. CT imaging-based approaches to cochlear duct length estimation-a human temporal bone study.
Breitsprecher T; Dhanasingh A; Schulze M; Kipp M; Dakah RA; Oberhoffner T; Dau M; Frerich B; Weber MA; Langner S; Mlynski R; Weiss NM
Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1014-1023. PubMed ID: 34463797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The Validity and Reliability of Automatic Tooth Segmentation Generated Using Artificial Intelligence.
Al-Ubaydi AS; Al-Groosh D
ScientificWorldJournal; 2023; 2023():5933003. PubMed ID: 37497386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
