189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31630876)
1. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: assessment of proliferative activity using automated Ki-67 immunostaining.
Dessauvagie B; Thomas A; Thomas C; Robinson C; Combrink M; Budhavaram V; Kunjuraman B; Meehan K; Sterrett G; Harvey J
Pathology; 2019 Dec; 51(7):681-687. PubMed ID: 31630876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Invasive lobular breast cancer: the prognostic impact of histopathological grade, E-cadherin and molecular subtypes.
Engstrøm MJ; Opdahl S; Vatten LJ; Haugen OA; Bofin AM
Histopathology; 2015 Feb; 66(3):409-19. PubMed ID: 25283075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of clinical outcomes between luminal invasive ductal carcinoma and luminal invasive lobular carcinoma.
Adachi Y; Ishiguro J; Kotani H; Hisada T; Ichikawa M; Gondo N; Yoshimura A; Kondo N; Hattori M; Sawaki M; Fujita T; Kikumori T; Yatabe Y; Kodera Y; Iwata H
BMC Cancer; 2016 Mar; 16():248. PubMed ID: 27015895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Seven-year survey of classical and pleomorphic invasive lobular breast carcinomas in women from southeastern Serbia: Differences in clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features.
Ilic IR; Djordjevic NP; Randjelovic PJ; Stojanovic NM; Radulovic NS; Ilic RS
J BUON; 2016; 21(5):1113-1120. PubMed ID: 27837612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lobular breast cancers lack the inverse relationship between ER/PR status and cell growth rate characteristic of ductal cancers in two independent patient cohorts: implications for tumor biology and adjuvant therapy.
Wong H; Lau S; Cheung P; Wong TT; Parker A; Yau T; Epstein RJ
BMC Cancer; 2014 Nov; 14():826. PubMed ID: 25385074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Subtyping and prognostic assessment of invasive lobular breast carcinoma].
Sinn HP; Kellerhoff NM; Kellerhoff R; Bastert G; Otto HF
Pathologe; 1997 Jan; 18(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 9157403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomarker profile of invasive lobular carcinoma: pleomorphic versus classic subtypes, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis analyses.
Zhang Y; Luo X; Chen M; Yang L; Lei T; Pu T; Wei B; Bu H; Zhang Z
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Jul; 194(2):279-295. PubMed ID: 35666367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does routine grading of invasive lobular cancer of the breast have the same prognostic significance as for ductal cancers?
Sinha PS; Bendall S; Bates T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Dec; 26(8):733-7. PubMed ID: 11087636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Significance of 18F-FDG-PET in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.
Fujii T; Yajima R; Kurozumi S; Higuchi T; Obayashi S; Tokiniwa H; Nagaoka R; Takata D; Horiguchi J; Kuwano H
Anticancer Res; 2016 Oct; 36(10):5481-5485. PubMed ID: 27798919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practical issues concerning the implementation of Ki-67 proliferative index measurement in breast cancer reporting.
Harvey J; Thomas C; Wood B; Hardie M; Dessauvagie B; Combrinck M; Frost FA; Sterrett G
Pathology; 2015 Jan; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 25474507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of mitosis counting by automated phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) digital image analysis in a breast carcinoma tissue microarray.
Dessauvagie BF; Thomas C; Robinson C; Frost FA; Harvey J; Sterrett GF
Pathology; 2015 Jun; 47(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 25938351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expression of DDR1 and DVL1 in invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinoma does not correlate with histological type, grade and hormone receptor status.
Ameli F; Rose IM; Masir N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(6):2385-90. PubMed ID: 25824769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is There a Role for Oncotype Dx Testing in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma?
Conlon N; Ross DS; Howard J; Catalano JP; Dickler MN; Tan LK
Breast J; 2015; 21(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 26271749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.
Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Dasevicius D; Elie N; Iqbal Y; Bor C
Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(2):R35. PubMed ID: 24708745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated assessment of Ki-67 in breast cancer: the utility of digital image analysis using virtual triple staining and whole slide imaging.
Hida AI; Omanovic D; Pedersen L; Oshiro Y; Ogura T; Nomura T; Kurebayashi J; Kanomata N; Moriya T
Histopathology; 2020 Sep; 77(3):471-480. PubMed ID: 32578891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility and Prognostic Potential of Ki-67 Proliferation Index when Comparing Digital-Image Analysis with Standard Semi-Quantitative Evaluation in Breast Cancer.
Ács B; Madaras L; Kovács KA; Micsik T; Tőkés AM; Győrffy B; Kulka J; Szász AM
Pathol Oncol Res; 2018 Jan; 24(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 28401450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinicopathologic and biomarker analysis of invasive pleomorphic lobular carcinoma as compared with invasive classic lobular carcinoma: an experience in our institution and review of the literature.
Jacobs M; Fan F; Tawfik O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2012 Jun; 16(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 22197540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FDG uptake in breast cancer: correlation with biological and clinical prognostic parameters.
Buck A; Schirrmeister H; Kühn T; Shen C; Kalker T; Kotzerke J; Dankerl A; Glatting G; Reske S; Mattfeldt T
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Oct; 29(10):1317-23. PubMed ID: 12271413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
