BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31631241)

  • 1. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
    Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
    Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.
    Baldini B; Cavagnetto D; Baselli G; Sforza C; Tartaglia GM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35351080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
    Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the length of the mandibular ramus and the condylar process: a comparison of OPG, CBCT, CT, MRI, and lateral cephalometric measurements.
    Markic G; Müller L; Patcas R; Roos M; Lochbühler N; Peltomäki T; Karlo CA; Ullrich O; Kellenberger CJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 25154725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
    Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Cephalometry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Cassetta M; Altieri F; Di Giorgio R; Silvestri A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):e311-5. PubMed ID: 26080244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateral cephalometric analysis for treatment planning in orthodontics based on MRI compared with radiographs: A feasibility study in children and adolescents.
    Heil A; Lazo Gonzalez E; Hilgenfeld T; Kickingereder P; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Ozga AK; Sommer A; Lux CJ; Zingler S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174524. PubMed ID: 28334054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision of orthodontic cephalometric measurements on ultra low dose-low dose CBCT reconstructed cephalograms.
    van Bunningen RH; Dijkstra PU; Dieters A; van der Meer WJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Ren Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1543-1550. PubMed ID: 34453209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.
    Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
    Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of MRI with dedicated head and neck signal amplification coil and cone beam computed tomography: MRI is a useful tool in diagnostics of cranio-facial growth disorders.
    Grandoch A; Nestmann F; Kreppel M; Buller J; Borggrefe J; Zirk M; Zöller JE
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31439410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography.
    de Oliveira AE; Cevidanes LH; Phillips C; Motta A; Burke B; Tyndall D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):256-65. PubMed ID: 18718796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Repeatability of three-dimensional measurements based on cone-beam CT images].
    Liang SR; Gao WM; Bai YX; Yin WJ; Zhang N
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 48(4):248-52. PubMed ID: 24021207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cone-beam computed tomography airway measurements: Can we trust them?
    Obelenis Ryan DP; Bianchi J; Ignácio J; Wolford LM; Gonçalves JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jul; 156(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 31256838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.