These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3163139)

  • 1. A clinical comparison between xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of recurrent caries.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Apr; 65(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 3163139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries.
    White SC; Gratt BM; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Feb; 65(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 3422729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries.
    White SC; Hollender L; Gratt BM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 108(5):755-9. PubMed ID: 6588117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs.
    Wenzel A; Larsen MJ; Fejerskov O
    Caries Res; 1991; 25(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 1747887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of lesion size, restorative material, and film speed on the detection of recurrent caries.
    Matteson SR; Phillips C; Kantor ML; Leinedecker T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 2674831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Caries detection with xeroradiographs: the influence of observer experience.
    White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jul; 64(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 3475648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of xeroradiographs and two types of film for detecting caries in approximal surfaces of primary teeth.
    White SC; McMullin K
    Caries Res; 1986; 20(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 3463427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical trials of intraoral dental xeroradiography.
    White SC; Gratt BM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Nov; 99(5):810-6. PubMed ID: 385665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure reduction of 96% in intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Vandre RH; Lorton L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 Nov; 113(5):746-50. PubMed ID: 3465788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of a new F-speed film for caries detection.
    Ludlow JB; Abreu M; Mol A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11313732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
    Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Isayev A; Kurşun S; Yüksel S
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries.
    Clifton TL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 9780894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
    Russell M; Pitts NB
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.