166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31633198)
1. Basicranial ontogeny comparison in Pan troglodytes and Homo sapiens and its use for developmental stage definition of KNM-ER 42700.
Mori T; Harvati K
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Dec; 170(4):579-594. PubMed ID: 31633198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the status of the KNM-ER 42700 fossil using Homo erectus neurocranial development.
Baab KL; Nesbitt A; Hublin JJ; Neubauer S
J Hum Evol; 2021 May; 154():102980. PubMed ID: 33794419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconstruction, endocranial form and taxonomic affinity of the early Homo calvaria KNM-ER 42700.
Neubauer S; Gunz P; Leakey L; Leakey M; Hublin JJ; Spoor F
J Hum Evol; 2018 Aug; 121():25-39. PubMed ID: 29706231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of neurocranial shape in defining the boundaries of an expanded Homo erectus hypodigm.
Baab KL
J Hum Evol; 2016 Mar; 92():1-21. PubMed ID: 26989013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ontogenetic study of the skull in modern humans and the common chimpanzees: neotenic hypothesis reconsidered with a tridimensional Procrustes analysis.
Penin X; Berge C; Baylac M
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002 May; 118(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 11953945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A virtual reconstruction and comparative analysis of the KNM-ER 42700 cranium.
Bauer CC; Harvati K
Anthropol Anz; 2015; 72(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 25806649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A neonatal perspective on Homo erectus brain growth.
Cofran Z; DeSilva JM
J Hum Evol; 2015 Apr; 81():41-7. PubMed ID: 25771994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of ontogeny on estimates of KNM-WT 15000's adult body size.
Cunningham DL; Graves RR; Wescott DJ; McCarthy RC
J Hum Evol; 2018 Aug; 121():119-127. PubMed ID: 29754743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developmental age and taxonomic affinity of the Mojokerto child, Java, Indonesia.
Antón SC
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1997 Apr; 102(4):497-514. PubMed ID: 9140541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mojokerto revisited: evidence for an intermediate pattern of brain growth in Homo erectus.
O'Connell CA; DeSilva JM
J Hum Evol; 2013 Aug; 65(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 23815827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Just how strapping was KNM-WT 15000?
Graves RR; Lupo AC; McCarthy RC; Wescott DJ; Cunningham DL
J Hum Evol; 2010 Nov; 59(5):542-54. PubMed ID: 20846707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans.
Mitteroecker P; Gunz P; Bernhard M; Schaefer K; Bookstein FL
J Hum Evol; 2004 Jun; 46(6):679-97. PubMed ID: 15183670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How much more would KNM-WT 15000 have grown?
Ruff CB; Burgess ML
J Hum Evol; 2015 Mar; 80():74-82. PubMed ID: 25449954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Humeral anatomy of the KNM-ER 47000 upper limb skeleton from Ileret, Kenya: Implications for taxonomic identification.
Lague MR; Chirchir H; Green DJ; Mbua E; Harris JWK; Braun DR; Griffin NL; Richmond BG
J Hum Evol; 2019 Jan; 126():24-38. PubMed ID: 30583842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complete permanent mandibular dentition of early Homo from the upper Burgi Member of the Koobi Fora Formation, Ileret, Kenya.
Grine FE; Leakey MG; Gathago PN; Brown FH; Mongle CS; Yang D; Jungers WL; Leakey LN
J Hum Evol; 2019 Jun; 131():152-175. PubMed ID: 31182200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frontal bone virtual reconstruction and geometric morphometric analysis of the mid-Pleistocene hominin KNM-OG 45500 (Olorgesailie, Kenya).
Mori T; Profico A; Reyes-Centeno H; Harvati K
J Anthropol Sci; 2020 Dec; 98():49-72. PubMed ID: 33341758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spinal cord evolution in early Homo.
Meyer MR; Haeusler M
J Hum Evol; 2015 Nov; 88():43-53. PubMed ID: 26553817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphometric variation in Plio-Pleistocene hominid distal humeri.
Lague MR; Jungers WL
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1996 Nov; 101(3):401-27. PubMed ID: 8922185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ontogenetic allometry, heterochrony, and interspecific differences in the skull of African apes, using tridimensional Procrustes analysis.
Berge C; Penin X
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Jun; 124(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 15160366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative ontogeny in humans and chimpanzees: similarities, differences and paradoxes in postnatal growth and development of the skull.
Bastir M; Rosas A
Ann Anat; 2004 Dec; 186(5-6):503-9. PubMed ID: 15646284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
