181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31633318)
1. Temperature variations in pulp chamber: an in-vitro comparison between ultrasonic and rotating instruments in tooth preparation. Part 1.
Baldi D; Colombo J; Robiony M; Menini M; Bisagni E; Pera P
Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Feb; 69(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 31633318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pulp vitality during ultrasonic tooth preparation. Part 2.
Baldi D; Colombo J; Stacchi C; Menini M; Oronos A; Pera P
Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Feb; 69(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 32181608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonic versus high-speed cavity preparation: analysis of increases in pulpal temperature and time to complete preparation.
Vanderlei AD; Borges AL; Cavalcanti BN; Rode SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 100(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 18672127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative cutting effectiveness of an ultrasonic diamond tip and a high-speed diamond bur.
Lima LM; Motisuki C; Corat EJ; Santos-Pinto L
Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 19357615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of 10 different rotary cutting instruments. Part I: Turbine.
Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):248-61. PubMed ID: 19328278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tooth preparation: a study on the effect of different variables and a comparison between conventional and channeled diamond burs.
Galindo DF; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Greene TD; Moss ME; Lee HJ; Ben-Hanan U; Graser GN; Barzilay I
J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 13(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 15032891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of tooth preparation on pressure measured in the pulp chamber: a laboratory study.
Evans CD; Wilson PR
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 10709526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of tooth preparation burs on the roughness and bond strength of adhesives to human dentin surfaces.
Ayad MF; Maghrabi AA; Saif RE; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2011 Jun; 24(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 21874939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of ultrasonic instruments on the quality of preparation margins and bonding to dentin.
Ellis R; Bennani V; Purton D; Chandler N; Lowe B
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Aug; 24(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 22863135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thermal changes in the pulp chamber during different adhesive clean-up procedures.
Uysal T; Eldeniz AU; Usumez S; Usumez A
Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 15825786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro assessment of temperature change in the pulp chamber during cavity preparation.
Oztürk B; Uşümez A; Oztürk AN; Ozer F
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15153850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preparation Ferrule Design Effect on Endocrown Failure Resistance.
Einhorn M; DuVall N; Wajdowicz M; Brewster J; Roberts H
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e237-e242. PubMed ID: 28985446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subjective qualitative assessment of the finish line of prosthetic preparations submitted to different finishing instruments.
da Silva TF; de Melo MP; Pereira JR; Takeshita WM; Ceribelli BM; Vessoni Iwaki LC
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 27086105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temperature response in the pulpal chamber during ultrahigh-speed tooth preparation with diamond burs of different grit.
Ottl P; Lauer HC
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 9656172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pulpal space pressure and temperature changes from Nd:YAG laser irradiation of dentin.
Srimaneepong V; Palamara JE; Wilson PR
J Dent; 2002; 30(7-8):291-6. PubMed ID: 12554109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Two Trephine Techniques for Removal of Fractured Rotary Nickel-titanium Instruments from Root Canals.
Yang Q; Shen Y; Huang D; Zhou X; Gao Y; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2017 Jan; 43(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 27847136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High and low torque handpieces: cutting dynamics, enamel cracking and tooth temperature.
Watson TF; Flanagan D; Stone DG
Br Dent J; 2000 Jun; 188(12):680-6. PubMed ID: 11022384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
