These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31633587)
1. Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System? Kulkarni AG; Das S; Kunder TS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 31633587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Efficacy analysis of OLIF combined with posterior percutaneous internal fixation in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with or without redundant nerve roots]. Sun HZ; Zhang Y; Xiao L; Zhao QL; Liu C; Wu ZX Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2024 Apr; 37(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 38664203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes. Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study. Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility and Outcomes of Tubular Decompression in Extreme Stenosis. Kulkarni AG; Das S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Jun; 45(11):E647-E655. PubMed ID: 31809471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Yu B; Zhang J; Pan J; Wang Y; Chen Y; Zhao W; Wu D Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 33943023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Impact of sarcopenia on effectiveness of lumbar decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis]. Li Z; Zhang C; Wang H; Yu K; Zhang J; Wang Y Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 36(6):745-750. PubMed ID: 35712933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression. Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of hand grip strength on surgical outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary result. Shen F; Kim HJ; Lee NK; Chun HJ; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2018-2024. PubMed ID: 29679727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients. Sigmundsson FG; Jönsson B; Strömqvist B Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):638-46. PubMed ID: 25450653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of pain sensitivity on surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Kim HJ; Lee JI; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Ruscheweyh R; Kang SS; Yeom JS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25384051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and Safety of Full-endoscopic Decompression via Interlaminar Approach for Central or Lateral Recess Spinal Stenosis of the Lumbar Spine: A Meta-analysis. Lee CH; Choi M; Ryu DS; Choi I; Kim CH; Kim HS; Sohn MJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1756-1764. PubMed ID: 29794584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and uniportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis]. Han G; Ma L; Cheng Y; Zheng K; Qi J; Dong Z; Zhang Z; Yao D Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Mar; 38(3):324-330. PubMed ID: 38500426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of catastrophising on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Kim HJ; Park JW; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1546-54. PubMed ID: 26530659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study. Soliman MAR; Ali A Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E3. PubMed ID: 31042649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Step treatment strategy of degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spinal stenosis]. Zhang Z; Ren D; Sun T; Li F; Guan K; Zhao G; Shan J Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 25(8):951-5. PubMed ID: 21923023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement in predominant back pain following minimally invasive decompression for spinal stenosis. Korsun MK; Shahi P; Shinn DJ; Pajak A; Araghi K; Maayan O; Singh N; Tuma O; Asada T; Singh S; Kim AYE; Mai E; Lu AZ; Sheha E; Dowdell J; Qureshi S; Iyer S J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Oct; 39(4):576-582. PubMed ID: 37486867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Indirect effects of decompression surgery on glycemic homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and lumbar spinal stenosis. Kim HJ; Lee KW; Cho HG; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS Spine J; 2015 Jan; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24983668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]