368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31633727)
1. CLINICAL UTILITY OF RISK SCORES IN VARICEAL BLEEDING.
Chandnani S; Rathi P; Udgirkar SS; Sonthalia N; Contractor Q; Jain S
Arq Gastroenterol; 2019; 56(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 31633727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in western India: A prospective analysis.
Chandnani S; Rathi P; Sonthalia N; Udgirkar S; Jain S; Contractor Q; Jain S; Singh AK
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):117-127. PubMed ID: 31124017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
Rout G; Sharma S; Gunjan D; Kedia S; Nayak B; Shalimar
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
Robertson M; Ng J; Abu Shawish W; Swaine A; Skardoon G; Huynh A; Deshpande S; Low ZY; Sievert W; Angus P
Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
Tantai XX; Liu N; Yang LB; Wei ZC; Xiao CL; Song YH; Wang JH
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Park JH; Kim JS; Kang SH; Sung JK; Lee ES; Kim SH; Lee BS; Jeong HY
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):193. PubMed ID: 32552662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
Reed EA; Dalton H; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Cahill A; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Forrest EH; Morris J; Stanley AJ
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Anchu AC; Mohsina S; Sureshkumar S; Mahalakshmy T; Kate V
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 28393330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Etiology and adverse outcome predictors of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 589 patients in Nepal.
Shrestha UK; Sapkota S
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Apr; 59(4):814-22. PubMed ID: 24282053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Thanapirom K; Ridtitid W; Rerknimitr R; Thungsuk R; Noophun P; Wongjitrat C; Luangjaru S; Vedkijkul P; Lertkupinit C; Poonsab S; Ratanachu-ek T; Hansomburana P; Pornthisarn B; Thongbai T; Mahachai V; Treeprasertsuk S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Far from an ideal score.
Aluizio CLS; Montes CG; Reis GFSR; Nagasako CK
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e2921. PubMed ID: 34190855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
