These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31633983)

  • 1. Probing Quantum Criticality and Symmetry Breaking at the Microscopic Level.
    Makhalov V; Satoor T; Evrard A; Chalopin T; Lopes R; Nascimbene S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Sep; 123(12):120601. PubMed ID: 31633983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of mixed permutation symmetry sectors in the thermodynamic limit of critical three-level Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick atom models.
    Calixto M; Mayorgas A; Guerrero J
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Jan; 103(1-1):012116. PubMed ID: 33601600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Localization measures of parity adapted U(D)-spin coherent states applied to the phase space analysis of the D-level Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Mayorgas A; Guerrero J; Calixto M
    Phys Rev E; 2023 Aug; 108(2-1):024107. PubMed ID: 37723708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantum fidelity for degenerate ground states in quantum phase transitions.
    Su YH; Hu BQ; Li SH; Cho SY
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Sep; 88(3):032110. PubMed ID: 24125217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamical Critical Scaling of Long-Range Interacting Quantum Magnets.
    Defenu N; Enss T; Kastner M; Morigi G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2018 Dec; 121(24):240403. PubMed ID: 30608754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-Markovianity of a Central Spin Interacting with a Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick Bath via a Conditional Past-Future Correlation.
    Han L; Zou J; Li H; Shao B
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Aug; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 33286664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the dissipative Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model with proposed realization in optical cavity QED.
    Morrison S; Parkins AS
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Feb; 100(4):040403. PubMed ID: 18352244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probing dynamical phase transitions with a superconducting quantum simulator.
    Xu K; Sun ZH; Liu W; Zhang YR; Li H; Dong H; Ren W; Zhang P; Nori F; Zheng D; Fan H; Wang H
    Sci Adv; 2020 Jun; 6(25):eaba4935. PubMed ID: 32596458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonequilibrium Criticality in Quench Dynamics of Long-Range Spin Models.
    Titum P; Maghrebi MF
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Jul; 125(4):040602. PubMed ID: 32794797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantum criticality of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model in terms of fidelity susceptibility.
    Kwok HM; Ning WQ; Gu SJ; Lin HQ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):032103. PubMed ID: 18851088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Global quantum discord in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model at zero and finite temperatures.
    Bao J; Liu YH; Guo B
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2021 Sep; 33(49):. PubMed ID: 34517354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation of XXZ Spin Models Using Sideband Transitions in Trapped Bosonic Gases.
    Chu A; Will J; Arlt J; Klempt C; Rey AM
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Dec; 125(24):240504. PubMed ID: 33412075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Engineering random spin models with atoms in a high-finesse cavity.
    Sauerwein N; Orsi F; Uhrich P; Bandyopadhyay S; Mattiotti F; Cantat-Moltrecht T; Pupillo G; Hauke P; Brantut JP
    Nat Phys; 2023; 19(8):1128-1134. PubMed ID: 37575364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equivalence of critical scaling laws for many-body entanglement in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Orús R; Dusuel S; Vidal J
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Jul; 101(2):025701. PubMed ID: 18764198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Work statistics and symmetry breaking in an excited-state quantum phase transition.
    Mzaouali Z; Puebla R; Goold J; El Baz M; Campbell S
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Mar; 103(3-1):032145. PubMed ID: 33862795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Avoided crossings and dynamical tunneling close to excited-state quantum phase transitions.
    Nader DJ; González-Rodríguez CA; Lerma-Hernández S
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Dec; 104(6-1):064116. PubMed ID: 35030927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exact spectrum of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model in the thermodynamic limit and finite-size corrections.
    Ribeiro P; Vidal J; Mosseri R
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Aug; 78(2 Pt 1):021106. PubMed ID: 18850785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emergence of mesoscale quantum phase transitions in a ferromagnet.
    Wendl A; Eisenlohr H; Rucker F; Duvinage C; Kleinhans M; Vojta M; Pfleiderer C
    Nature; 2022 Sep; 609(7925):65-70. PubMed ID: 36045242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classical description of the parameter space geometry in the Dicke and Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick models.
    Gonzalez D; Gutiérrez-Ruiz D; Vergara JD
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Jul; 104(1-1):014113. PubMed ID: 34412288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonadiabatic dynamics of the excited states for the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Kopylov W; Schaller G; Brandes T
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Jul; 96(1-1):012153. PubMed ID: 29347272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.