These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3163448)
1. The "Dicor" inlay/onlay. Case report and summary of advantages. Boyajian GK; Hart RI; Sausen RE W V Dent J; 1988 Jan; 62(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 3163448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Inlays with Dicor. Cast ceramic in place of wax]. Attual Dent; 1987 Apr; 3(13):38-9, 41-3. PubMed ID: 3477240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The double-inlay technique: a new concept and improvement in design. Dailey B; Gateau P; Covo Dds L J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):624-7. PubMed ID: 11404764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites. Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Ozturk N; Aykent F J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Dicor glass ceramic: esthetic material also for inlays and onlays]. Mönkmeyer U Quintessenz Zahntech; 1986 Nov; 12(11):1163-9. PubMed ID: 3468553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Utilization possibilities of ceramic reconstruction materials. 1. Direct ceramic inlay (Dicor)]. Järer K; Wirz J; Jungo M Quintessenz; 1989 Aug; 40(8):1511-7. PubMed ID: 2640018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital radiology. Facts and fictions. Dunn SM; Kantor ML J Am Dent Assoc; 1993 Dec; 124(12):38-47. PubMed ID: 8277056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Molin MK; Karlsson SL Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study. Shannon A Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays. Estafan D; Dussetschleger F; Agosta C; Reich S Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cerec classic: the inlay with Cerec 3D step-by-step. Schenk O Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jan; 6(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 12838590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]