BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31634635)

  • 1. Prospective Peer Review in Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning: Long-Term Results From a Longitudinal Study.
    Cox BW; Teckie S; Kapur A; Chou H; Potters L
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2020; 10(4):e199-e206. PubMed ID: 31634635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective contouring rounds: A novel, high-impact tool for optimizing quality assurance.
    Cox BW; Kapur A; Sharma A; Lee L; Bloom B; Sharma R; Goode G; Potters L
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(5):e431-e436. PubMed ID: 26215585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Multi-Institutional Prospective Peer Review on Target and Organ-at-Risk Delineation in Radiation Therapy.
    Riegel AC; Vaccarelli M; Cox BW; Chou H; Cao Y; Potters L
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2019 Mar; 9(2):e228-e235. PubMed ID: 30415075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer Review of Radiotherapy Planning: Quantifying Outcomes and a Proposal for Prospective Data Collection.
    Mackenzie J; Graham G; Olivotto IA
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Dec; 28(12):e192-e198. PubMed ID: 27633327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Peer Review Quality Assurance Rounds Incorporating Direct Physical Examination for Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy.
    Cardenas CE; Mohamed ASR; Tao R; Wong AJR; Awan MJ; Kuruvila S; Aristophanous M; Gunn GB; Phan J; Beadle BM; Frank SJ; Garden AS; Morrison WH; Fuller CD; Rosenthal DI
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):532-540. PubMed ID: 28258898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Processes for the Assessment of Radiation Target Volumes in Head and Neck Cancer.
    Gogineni E; Schaefer D; Ewing A; Andraos T; DiCostanzo D; Weldon M; Christ D; Baliga S; Jhawar S; Mitchell D; Grecula J; Konieczkowski DJ; Palmer J; Jahraus T; Dibs K; Chakravarti A; Martin D; Gamez ME; Blakaj D
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2024; 14(3):e205-e213. PubMed ID: 38237893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practice patterns for peer review in radiation oncology.
    Hoopes DJ; Johnstone PA; Chapin PS; Kabban CM; Lee WR; Chen AB; Fraass BA; Skinner WJ; Marks LB
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 25413419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Decade of Prospective Peer Review: Impact on Safety Culture and Lessons Learned in a Multicenter Radiation Medicine Department.
    Tchelebi LT; Kapur A; Chou H; Potters L
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2023; 13(4):e325-e331. PubMed ID: 36706911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of peer-review quality rounds for gynecologic brachytherapy in a high-volume academic center.
    Huynh-Le MP; Simon AB; Hoopes DJ; Einck JP; Yashar CM; Scanderbeg D; Rash D; Brown D; Mell LK; Sanghvi PR; Mundt AJ; Pawlicki T; Mayadev JS
    Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(6):881-888. PubMed ID: 31917179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comprehensive Analysis of a Prospective Multidisciplinary Peer Review Process Before Radiation Therapy Simulation.
    Kotecha R; LeGrand LA; Valladares MA; Castillo AM; Rubens M; Quintana G; Chisem M; Appel H; Chuong MD; Hall MD; Contreras JA; Fagundes M; Gutierrez A; Mehta MP
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2021; 11(4):e366-e375. PubMed ID: 33197645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancing safety and quality through preplanning peer review for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy.
    Matuszak MM; Hadley SW; Feng M; Hayman JA; Brock KK; Burger P; Owen D; Suresh K; Schipper M; Lawrence TS; Moran JM
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2016; 6(2):e39-46. PubMed ID: 26746815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detailed prospective peer review in a community radiation oncology clinic.
    Mitchell JD; Chesnut TJ; Eastham DV; Demandante CN; Hoopes DJ
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 27720701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Blinded, Prospective Study of Error Detection During Physician Chart Rounds in Radiation Oncology.
    Talcott WJ; Lincoln H; Kelly JR; Tressel L; Wilson LD; Decker RH; Ford E; Hartvigson PE; Pawlicki T; Evans SB
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2020; 10(5):312-320. PubMed ID: 32888524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Directly Improving the Quality of Radiation Treatment Through Peer Review: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Cancer Centers Across a Provincial Cancer Program.
    Rouette J; Gutierrez E; O'Donnell J; Reddeman L; Hart M; Foxcroft S; Mitera G; Warde P; Brundage MD; ;
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 28258891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of quality assurance rounds in a Canadian radiation therapy department.
    Lefresne S; Olivotto IA; Joe H; Blood PA; Olson RA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(3):e117-21. PubMed ID: 23195781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance peer review chart rounds in 2011: a survey of academic institutions in the United States.
    Lawrence YR; Whiton MA; Symon Z; Wuthrick EJ; Doyle L; Harrison AS; Dicker AP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):590-5. PubMed ID: 22445006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancing value of quality assurance rounds in improving radiotherapy management: a retrospective analysis from King Hussein Cancer Center in Jordan.
    Khader JK; Al-Mousa AM; Mohamad IA; Abuhijlih RA; Al-Khatib SA; Alnsour AZ; Asha WA; Ramahi SW; Hosni AA; Abuhijla FJ
    Radiat Oncol J; 2019 Mar; 37(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 30947482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of a real time group consensus peer review process in radiation oncology: an evaluation of effectiveness and feasibility.
    Albert AA; Duggar WN; Bhandari RP; Vengaloor Thomas T; Packianathan S; Allbright RM; Kanakamedala MR; Mehta D; Yang CC; Vijayakumar S
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):239. PubMed ID: 30509283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Transitioning to Prospective Contouring and Planning Rounds as Peer Review.
    Surucu M; Bajaj A; Roeske JC; Block AM; Price J; Small W; Solanki AA
    Adv Radiat Oncol; 2019; 4(3):532-540. PubMed ID: 31360810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer Review of Head and Neck Cancer Planning Target Volumes in Radiation Oncology.
    Hesse J; Chen L; Yu Y; Kang JJ; Riaz N; Tsai CJ; McBride SM; Gelblum D; Zakeri K; Lee NY
    Adv Radiat Oncol; 2022; 7(3):100917. PubMed ID: 35647395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.